ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 35426
09/25/2013 11:20 PM
Hot Southernmess in a Dress
Posts: 8746
09/25/2013 11:40 PM
Posts: 6866
09/26/2013 12:45 AM
Hates Everything. '14
cheddarcheese2 wrote:I agree that the kids should not be chased and stalked by the paparazzi because they didn't have a choice in being famous or not. But I almost kind of want to roll my eyes because we have bigger issues to worry about than rich peoples kids being photographed If that makes sense.
Posts: 5647
09/26/2013 2:14 AM
Baby on JJBoard
Posts: 38898
09/26/2013 2:28 AM
Biggest Scandal '09
Posts: 116270
09/26/2013 8:49 AM
Posts: 26479
09/26/2013 9:25 AM
cheddarcheese2 wrote: I agree that the kids should not be chased and stalked by the paparazzi because they didn't have a choice in being famour or not. But I almost kind of want to roll my eyes because we have bigger issues to worry about than rich peoples kids being photographed If that makes sense.
Posts: 13975
09/26/2013 9:48 AM
Needs Attention '12Petition Maker '13
Posts: 12702
09/26/2013 10:19 AM
09/26/2013 10:28 AM
09/26/2013 10:33 AM
Bunton wrote: PS: lol @ Nia Vardalos joining the cause. Does anybody even follow her? I only know her from the big fat greek wedding and then never heard of her again. Does she even have children?
Posts: 6500
09/26/2013 12:33 PM
Fassy's Lassy '13
NsYnC FaN 364 wrote:So what does this mean exactly? It sounds like they can still photograph the children, they just can't yell at them, scream their name, or get in their way. Is that correct? Honestly, I don't think this bill passing will do much to help the situation.
09/26/2013 2:02 PM
09/26/2013 2:18 PM
Posts: 3056
09/26/2013 2:19 PM
cheddarcheese2 wrote:I agree that the kids should not be chased and stalked by the paparazzi because they didn't have a choice in being famour or not. But I almost kind of want to roll my eyes because we have bigger issues to worry about than rich peoples kids being photographed If that makes sense.
09/26/2013 2:32 PM
floacism wrote:cheddarcheese2 wrote:I agree that the kids should not be chased and stalked by the paparazzi because they didn't have a choice in being famour or not. But I almost kind of want to roll my eyes because we have bigger issues to worry about than rich peoples kids being photographed If that makes sense.So because they're rich, the protection of their kids doesn't matter?
09/26/2013 2:34 PM
09/26/2013 2:45 PM
Posts: 32623
i am the lizard queen
Posts: 7537
09/26/2013 3:22 PM
cocoacritic wrote:floacism wrote:cheddarcheese2 wrote:I agree that the kids should not be chased and stalked by the paparazzi because they didn't have a choice in being famour or not. But I almost kind of want to roll my eyes because we have bigger issues to worry about than rich peoples kids being photographed If that makes sense.So because they're rich, the protection of their kids doesn't matter? Perhaps the parents shouldn't court the attention in the first place.Mel Gibson has what, 20 kids? When the sugar-tits incident went down and the affairs became public and the abusive shouting matches flooded the net, how was he able to protect his children? We saw his baby girl with Oksana because she was using the child to get attention during the court battle. Now all we see is one photo here and there.Same thing goes for Schwarzenegger, where are the daily photos of his son Joseph since the scandal?Most of the garbage Halle is getting is because of her actions. She tried to manipulate the media using the paparazzi and now shit has backfired. Affleck has NO problem with daily photos of his kids when he has a Best Picture on the line.
Share This Link