ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 72
06/08/2007 7:00 AM
BabySmith O wrote: ^^ Thank you famcape. Along with being a pain in Pitt's ass, that's another reason why she's loathed in HW. The woman tried to retain control of a company that she wasn't hers -- it was Pitt and Brad Grey's baby - he only involved her to begin with so that she could finally get the MOVIE roles she couldn't get without HIM, 'BRAD PITT,' THE MOVIE STAR (hello??!!) seeing as she was a mediocre sit-com actress. Or do you really think she would have gotten the same deal producing A-list features, while acting on a lame sit-com, if she had been hitched to Tate Donovan or Adam Duritz?? Bahaha! Brad even said, and I quote, Plan B "was like the child of a bitter divorce." Daddy got rightful custody, because Mama didn't give birth to sh*t. Like Marianne Pearl said, Brad was the only person in HW who had read her book. Brad read and found the stories and bought the rights, which got made into films. Aniston doesn't read sh*t. She even admittedly said she doesn't even read the newspaper and is woefully ignorant of current events. Yet you think she's actually 'producing' anything?? Give me a break. She doesn't do anything under her own steam. She even had to have a pal help her 'co-direct' a 10 minute movie for Pete's sake, she 'co-designed' a water bottle label. A. water. bottle. She's a case of luck, good timing, a great 90's layer cut, and hardcore ambition to land a job, getting her where she is today.
Posts: 65
06/08/2007 7:18 AM
shelley2 wrote: BabySmith O wrote: Its great how the attention placed on Jennifer gets Jolie's insane fans all pissed off. No sweetheart, you're the crazy Jolie fan still whining about any happiness Jennifer has. How does that affect you personally? It doesn't. It might be surprising, but Jennifer has MOVED ON. Get it? She doesn't think about the other two, and she doesn't care about the other two. She's just living, but apparently Jolie and her fans can't understand and can't stand that fact. And you're the incredibly naive one if you don't realize that Jennifer sells magazines. That's a fact, look it up. And oh yes, clueless one, she sold magazines before her relationship with pitty boy. The Rolling Stone interview she did in 1996 was one of its biggest sellers. Her interviews are always big sellers. Why? Because people like her and she's extremely popular. And that's a fact too, check out the Gallup poll. No one said People's editors sat outside her house. Photographers do, ALL DAY. Of course they're going to get pictures of the guy and sell them. People magazine then ID'd the guy. That's how its done, or are you too naive to realize it. Duh, you and your alter ego's claim Jennifer has no career, no one cares, well clearly they do hon. That's why they put her on the cover this week. And you can believe its all a big conspiracy if it makes you feel better, but it ain't. So sorry that you resent and continue to whine about any attention Jennifer gets. That's just so sad. , but TFB because Jennifer deserves a life and to be happy. She shouldn't have to adjust her life because she's afaid it might detract from the two dumbo's pathetic pr whoring.
BabySmith O wrote:
All 4 of her films BOMBED at the box office last year. How's that for popularity? If ever there was a time that she was gonna maybe have a hit on her own, the year of her 'Pity Party' extraordinaire would have been the one, don't you think? Every movie she's ever made, that wasn't with one of those male 'kings of comedy' (Stiller, Carey, Vaughn) BOMBED. We won't even go into the fact that they were critically SAVAGED, and her lack of acting talent ridiculed..please... GIVE IT UP. Stop likening Jennifer Aniston and her PR b*tch Huvane's desperate attempt to keep her relevant and in the public eye, by AS USUAL latching her on to Brad & Angelina's coattails AT STRATEGIC TIMES, evidence of her own popularity. It's simple. She was popular before because she was with Pitt. She's popular now because she was dumped by Pitt, and is pathetically milking that for all it's worth. That's right, even feeding fake news items to weeklies, they did it with the 'phony engagement' story that got her ass kicked for 6 consecutive weeks by Janice Min, and now they've just done it with People. You know, and I know, and everyone in the room knows had she gotten hitched to Tate Donavan, we wouldn't be talking about her fug no-talent ass in this thread now.
Oh, and if it makes you feel better to think that Brad Pitt was not talking 'literally' when he said 'Plan B' was like the "child of a bitter divorce," then you go right ahead and wrap yourself up in your delusions - but there's a reason why he loathes Vanity Fair, doesn't speak to Maniston, and why HW is contemptuous of her, she and her lawyers laughingly tried to play hardball with Pitt, and he demolished her. It's very obvious, as her PR team also leaked all those stories about Jen 'playing Marianne Pearl' <-- - which was NEVER the case...Brad Pitt is not insane, he wouldn't have let that ignorant sit-com HACK NEAR AMH.
...and once again, you need to learn the business of show. I see you don't know much about it - as perhaps you too are only about the TEEVEE girl. But here's how it works, it's not called 'PR whoring,' it's called doing promotions for your films that are releasing. When MOVIE STARS have FILMS to promote they do press, promos, premieres and publicity. I guess you wouldn't KNOW that, as your only familiar with mediocre sit-com hacks and syndication and cable and the like.
06/08/2007 7:58 AM
Posts: 7748
06/08/2007 8:09 AM
BabySmith O wrote: shelley2 wrote: BabySmith O wrote: Its great how the attention placed on Jennifer gets Jolie's insane fans all pissed off. No sweetheart, you're the crazy Jolie fan still whining about any happiness Jennifer has. How does that affect you personally? It doesn't. It might be surprising, but Jennifer has MOVED ON. Get it? She doesn't think about the other two, and she doesn't care about the other two. She's just living, but apparently Jolie and her fans can't understand and can't stand that fact. And you're the incredibly naive one if you don't realize that Jennifer sells magazines. That's a fact, look it up. And oh yes, clueless one, she sold magazines before her relationship with pitty boy. The Rolling Stone interview she did in 1996 was one of its biggest sellers. Her interviews are always big sellers. Why? Because people like her and she's extremely popular. And that's a fact too, check out the Gallup poll. No one said People's editors sat outside her house. Photographers do, ALL DAY. Of course they're going to get pictures of the guy and sell them. People magazine then ID'd the guy. That's how its done, or are you too naive to realize it. Duh, you and your alter ego's claim Jennifer has no career, no one cares, well clearly they do hon. That's why they put her on the cover this week. And you can believe its all a big conspiracy if it makes you feel better, but it ain't. So sorry that you resent and continue to whine about any attention Jennifer gets. That's just so sad. , but TFB because Jennifer deserves a life and to be happy. She shouldn't have to adjust her life because she's afaid it might detract from the two dumbo's pathetic pr whoring. All 4 of her films BOMBED at the box office last year. How's that for popularity? If ever there was a time that she was gonna maybe have a hit on her own, the year of her 'Pity Party' extraordinaire would have been the one, don't you think? Every movie she's ever made, that wasn't with one of those male 'kings of comedy' (Stiller, Carey, Vaughn) BOMBED. We won't even go into the fact that they were critically SAVAGED, and her lack of acting talent ridiculed..please... GIVE IT UP. Stop likening Jennifer Aniston and her PR b*tch Huvane's desperate attempt to keep her relevant and in the public eye, by AS USUAL latching her on to Brad & Angelina's coattails AT STRATEGIC TIMES, evidence of her own popularity. It's simple. She was popular before because she was with Pitt. She's popular now because she was dumped by Pitt, and is pathetically milking that for all it's worth. That's right, even feeding fake news items to weeklies, they did it with the 'phony engagement' story that got her ass kicked for 6 consecutive weeks by Janice Min, and now they've just done it with People. You know, and I know, and everyone in the room knows had she gotten hitched to Tate Donavan, we wouldn't be talking about her fug no-talent ass in this thread now. Oh, and if it makes you feel better to think that Brad Pitt was not talking 'literally' when he said 'Plan B' was like the "child of a bitter divorce," then you go right ahead and wrap yourself up in your delusions - but there's a reason why he loathes Vanity Fair, doesn't speak to Maniston, and why HW is contemptuous of her, she and her lawyers laughingly tried to play hardball with Pitt, and he demolished her. It's very obvious, as her PR team also leaked all those stories about Jen 'playing Marianne Pearl' <-- - which was NEVER the case...Brad Pitt is not insane, he wouldn't have let that ignorant sit-com HACK NEAR AMH. ...and once again, you need to learn the business of show. I see you don't know much about it - as perhaps you too are only about the TEEVEE girl. But here's how it works, it's not called 'PR whoring,' it's called doing promotions for your films that are releasing. When MOVIE STARS have FILMS to promote they do press, promos, premieres and publicity. I guess you wouldn't KNOW that, as your only familiar with mediocre sit-com hacks and syndication and cable and the like.
06/08/2007 8:35 AM
Posts: 926
06/08/2007 8:38 AM
Posts: 4264
06/08/2007 9:02 AM
BabySmith O wrote: ^^ who's talking about money you idiot. I really worry about our educational system listening to some of you. I never said she didn't have money. Jeebus, she's a sit-com hack who was on the boob tube for 10 years of course she has money, just like Ray Romano and Patricia Heaton might have more money than Al Pacino and Meryl Streep. Big whoop. That doesn't make them NOT the tv schlocks that they are.
I do think Ray Romano has more money than Al Pacino and Meryl Streep. He has been in the business for 10yrs while Pacino and Streep have been for decades. He's making a lot from Everybody Loves Raymond since he's also a producer.
Posts: 235
06/08/2007 9:56 AM
BabySmith O wrote: shelley2 wrote: ^^ Give it up already and let Jennifer live her life. She's not "backing off" from anything. Her publicist in his round about way said no comment. Give it a rest. You're truly naive if you believe that Jennifer needs to feed tabloids or People magazine for that matter anything about her love life. She sells magazines, or do you not understand that? Just accept it. ...Shyeah - riiiiiiiight, and WHY does she sell magazines? Or do you think she'd STILL sell magazines had she been the same lame TV sit-com actress married to Tate Donovan, and gone crying and whining to anyone who would listen that HE left her for Alyssa Milano? If you say yes, you're lying to us and yourself, in a big BIG way. She sells magazines because of BRAD PITT. Now she sells even more because of BRAD PITT and ANGELINA JOLIE. She made herself into the loser of the century, who was scorned and rejected and HURT by them - so some people want and need to know how 'Poor Jen' is doing.. That's what motors the sales now more than ever, even moreso than when she was with 'Brad Pitt.' And no, it didn't require any direct sources. If you notice they talk to an ex girlfriend, his parents, and they ID him outside Jennifer's house, which is always swarmed with paparazzis. That's how it was done, they stake out her house. Get a clue. Stake out her house?? Talk to sources?? Bahaha! Are you kidding me??! People Magazine isn't STAR or In Touch..they aren't even US magazine. More importantly, why would Jennifer Aniston 'maybe' dating an aging balding unknown male model from the UK, be cover story material and Jennifer Aniston 'maybe' dating Vince Vaughn NOT be?? You honestly think People Magazine is going to hide in her bushes to print 'cover stories' on these 'bunch of guys' that Aniston is dating. You're so deluded. People Mag doesn't do investigative 'cover story' reports on who ex sit-com stars might be dating - even ex sit-com stars who 'used to be married to MOVIE STARS.' People Mag was GIVEN reliable info from DIRECT sources (sometimes the subject or the publicist themselves), and it usually is with the implicit approval of all parties concerned. If you notice, Huvane does not deny he talked to People Mag, or even that he knew about the cover story - he's just saying the story is 'premature.' That doesn't mean he didn't give them approval to run it, and plant her fug face on the cover. YOU get a clue. You sound incredibly naive. God, the universe doesn't require 24/7 attention on little pitty and his attention-seeking HO. Besides which Paris is pretty much the news of the week anyway. God, let's remember that HO's are the one's that blow sit-com writers for juicier storylines, BEFORE she hooked up with 'Pitty' of course, so it's all good....but that definitely MAKES the HO. If you're still one of these hypocrites whining about how Angelina got with Pitt when he was offically LEGALLY separated and had filed for divorce, but before he was technically divorced - well then there are a LOT of HOs walking around, including Aniston herself who was boning Vaughn, Reese Witherspoon, Aniston pal Courtney Cox who lived with married Michael Keaton, Aniston pal Laura Dern who lived with married Billy Bob Thornton and married Ben Harper (even getting preg a few months after his wife). Let's also remember that when you're out doing promos and press junkets for your own critically acclaimed FILM that is scheduled to release - going on talk shows, doing mag interviews, and going to the premieres and festivals, it's called WORKING and DOING YOUR JOB.....THAT is what Angelina is doing - that is what she is SUPPOSED to be doing. She would be derelict of duty with the studios if she did not, ditto Brad. This IS the woman who you didn't hear about her private personal life, for a year and half - while Aniston on the other hand, ran and cried in Oprah's bazooms 4 times in 1 year. Angelina's press coincides with her work, or a big life event like the birth of/adoption of -- her kids. However, Aniston, has not a G*d*mn'd thing going on, except shilling tap water, her plastic surgery, and dating 'a bunch of guys,' -- so her publicist is leaking info on her so-called personal life to magazines with her approval, so he can get her a cover for NO EFFIN reason whatsoever (in the middle of her arch nemesis' 'Brangelina's' loving appearances on red carpets worldwide promoting their films...oooh, just a coinky dinky riiiiiiight?? ) - now that, THAT, is called an 'attention $$%+%!'
shelley2 wrote: ^^ Give it up already and let Jennifer live her life. She's not "backing off" from anything. Her publicist in his round about way said no comment. Give it a rest. You're truly naive if you believe that Jennifer needs to feed tabloids or People magazine for that matter anything about her love life. She sells magazines, or do you not understand that? Just accept it. ...Shyeah - riiiiiiiight, and WHY does she sell magazines? Or do you think she'd STILL sell magazines had she been the same lame TV sit-com actress married to Tate Donovan, and gone crying and whining to anyone who would listen that HE left her for Alyssa Milano? If you say yes, you're lying to us and yourself, in a big BIG way. She sells magazines because of BRAD PITT. Now she sells even more because of BRAD PITT and ANGELINA JOLIE. She made herself into the loser of the century, who was scorned and rejected and HURT by them - so some people want and need to know how 'Poor Jen' is doing.. That's what motors the sales now more than ever, even moreso than when she was with 'Brad Pitt.' And no, it didn't require any direct sources. If you notice they talk to an ex girlfriend, his parents, and they ID him outside Jennifer's house, which is always swarmed with paparazzis. That's how it was done, they stake out her house. Get a clue. Stake out her house?? Talk to sources?? Bahaha! Are you kidding me??! People Magazine isn't STAR or In Touch..they aren't even US magazine. More importantly, why would Jennifer Aniston 'maybe' dating an aging balding unknown male model from the UK, be cover story material and Jennifer Aniston 'maybe' dating Vince Vaughn NOT be?? You honestly think People Magazine is going to hide in her bushes to print 'cover stories' on these 'bunch of guys' that Aniston is dating. You're so deluded. People Mag doesn't do investigative 'cover story' reports on who ex sit-com stars might be dating - even ex sit-com stars who 'used to be married to MOVIE STARS.' People Mag was GIVEN reliable info from DIRECT sources (sometimes the subject or the publicist themselves), and it usually is with the implicit approval of all parties concerned. If you notice, Huvane does not deny he talked to People Mag, or even that he knew about the cover story - he's just saying the story is 'premature.' That doesn't mean he didn't give them approval to run it, and plant her fug face on the cover. YOU get a clue. You sound incredibly naive. God, the universe doesn't require 24/7 attention on little pitty and his attention-seeking HO. Besides which Paris is pretty much the news of the week anyway. God, let's remember that HO's are the one's that blow sit-com writers for juicier storylines, BEFORE she hooked up with 'Pitty' of course, so it's all good....but that definitely MAKES the HO. If you're still one of these hypocrites whining about how Angelina got with Pitt when he was offically LEGALLY separated and had filed for divorce, but before he was technically divorced - well then there are a LOT of HOs walking around, including Aniston herself who was boning Vaughn, Reese Witherspoon, Aniston pal Courtney Cox who lived with married Michael Keaton, Aniston pal Laura Dern who lived with married Billy Bob Thornton and married Ben Harper (even getting preg a few months after his wife). Let's also remember that when you're out doing promos and press junkets for your own critically acclaimed FILM that is scheduled to release - going on talk shows, doing mag interviews, and going to the premieres and festivals, it's called WORKING and DOING YOUR JOB.....THAT is what Angelina is doing - that is what she is SUPPOSED to be doing. She would be derelict of duty with the studios if she did not, ditto Brad. This IS the woman who you didn't hear about her private personal life, for a year and half - while Aniston on the other hand, ran and cried in Oprah's bazooms 4 times in 1 year. Angelina's press coincides with her work, or a big life event like the birth of/adoption of -- her kids. However, Aniston, has not a G*d*mn'd thing going on, except shilling tap water, her plastic surgery, and dating 'a bunch of guys,' -- so her publicist is leaking info on her so-called personal life to magazines with her approval, so he can get her a cover for NO EFFIN reason whatsoever (in the middle of her arch nemesis' 'Brangelina's' loving appearances on red carpets worldwide promoting their films...oooh, just a coinky dinky riiiiiiight?? ) - now that, THAT, is called an 'attention $$%+%!'
Posts: 5166
06/08/2007 10:26 AM
06/08/2007 10:52 AM
Posts: 7862
06/08/2007 1:55 PM
Posts: 3761
06/08/2007 2:59 PM
Jlgnxd wrote: OK I'm Jen fan and brangelina all the way so I'm fair. But seriously I wish jen would drop Huvane, he's pretty evil when it comes to exes of his clients. Also I wonder if Brad ever considered not to date Jen because of Huvane...the same dude that screwed over his image because of that bitc! paltrow!!! But I think Brad is used to it by now and he probably doesn't give a damn, or probably even expected Huvane to try to ruin Brad's image. I do think Huvane planned this new man thing and to bring it out the same time around Brad and Angie's promotional week...not to ride off them but to take away attention. BUT I don't think Jen's behind anything, Huvane does it all.
If I remember right Jennifer and Brad were set up on a date by their publicists, so that means the Stephen and Cindi hooked them up.
Posts: 11599
06/08/2007 3:12 PM
Posts: 20
06/08/2007 3:36 PM
Posts: 477
06/09/2007 12:50 AM
06/09/2007 12:55 AM
Posts: 298
06/09/2007 1:45 AM
06/09/2007 9:42 AM
Posts: 31950
06/10/2007 12:56 AM
Share This Link