Now they're both in LA, I'm gonna need some new couple pics 
The Official Justin and Jessica post: Part Two
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 All That Jaz |
|||
|
Posts: 59728 (11/07/2009 12:13 AM) |
|
||
 komodo05 |
|||
|
Posts: 9682 (11/07/2009 12:16 AM) |
All That Jaz wrote:yeah |
||
|
All That Jaz |
|||
|
Posts: 59729 (11/07/2009 12:17 AM) |
Not gonna hold my breath though
|
||
|
mintjulip49 |
|||
|
Posts: 4169 (11/07/2009 5:15 AM) |
BlairWaldorf wrote:The friend bit doesn't make sense. First of all, if for argument sake she was a genuine friend, then Justin would have said so and not gone ahead with proceedings and we wouldn't be here. Secondly, even if she was 'a friend', that doesn't mean that she doesn't warrant being restrained due to her behaviour. I hear what you're saying Blair and hope that it's not a big deal but one would have thought that the way this woman carries on, would have shown the judge the way the wind was blowing and that his presence wasn't necessary. Hopefully the judge isn't grandstanding because that would be twisted and has the irony of putting her in a similar category to that of the stalker. |
||
|
Kisses4NSync |
|||
|
Posts: 12390 (11/07/2009 10:48 AM) |
I personally think he should be required to show up in court. What kind of lawyer would advise his client not to show up? That doesn't make any sense.
Sure, I'd be a little scared at facing the stalker...but I'd be more than happy to testify against her.
I wouldn't take the word of some bodyguards. That's heresay. I'd wanna hear straight from the source. |
||
|
blair4990 |
|||
|
Posts: 17640 (11/07/2009 10:53 AM) |
Ingrid where did you read that his lawyers told him not to show up? I missed that part.
|
||
|
Kisses4NSync |
|||
|
Posts: 12391 (11/07/2009 10:58 AM) |
Oh well blair..it didn't actually say that in so many words..but I figure that has to be the reason he's not showing up. They have to be
telling him not to show up.
Also, getting a new judge is just crazy. Something's not right here. Why's the lawyers so gung-ho about Justin not showing up? I don't get it. |
||
|
BlairWaldorf |
|||
|
Posts: 1964 (11/07/2009 10:59 AM) |
Yeah i don't know where everyone is getting that from, that never was reported. They're just trying to get it so he doesn't have to get involved
with this court mess. I think, I don't know.
It's more than hearsay, people who work for him that were there at the time of these occurences
testified. It's not like a neighbor that saw police cars at his house and was like oh I think there's a problem there maybe a stalker.
|
||
|
bigley22 |
|||
|
Posts: 14117 (11/07/2009 12:33 PM) |
As I recall, Justin was not home when this woman showed up at his house. His security are the ones who stopped her and called the police. So what would Justin
be able to testify about? He witnessed nothing, has not met her and wasn't there when this all went down.
|
||
|
BlairWaldorf |
|||
|
Posts: 1965 (11/07/2009 12:38 PM) |
Yeah that's what I was wondering. All three of the incidents described in the report said that he was not home at the time so he can't really explain
what happened since he wasn't there at the times this happened. The whole thing doesn't make sense to me.
|
||
|
blair4990 |
|||
|
Posts: 17641 (11/07/2009 12:39 PM) |
In her filings with the court it has been stated that she claims to have had a long standing relationship with him and that he has done numerous things for her
over the years. He has to deny that is true. If he does in fact know her it changes things considerably. I mean she is still a crazed stalker fan but they
probably have to go a different way to get the restraining order. And only Justin can respond to that question. I still say it's not a big deal but more of
a legal technicality.
|
||
|
Kisses4NSync |
|||
|
Posts: 12392 (11/07/2009 12:42 PM) |
^Yeah it doesn't make sense to me either. Oh ok. I was thinking that he was at home at the time? I don't think the bodyguards should have said anything
because the whole story just loses all credibility for me. And why were the security at home and not with Justin? Unless he already had extra security with
him? None of this makes sense.
|
||
|
blair4990 |
|||
|
Posts: 17642 (11/07/2009 12:47 PM) |
Ingrid he is gone so much that I am sure he has full time private security for his home. They may even be there when he is home (I certainly hope so).
|
||
|
BlairWaldorf |
|||
|
Posts: 1966 (11/07/2009 12:47 PM) |
It was not plainly stated though, it was followed and preceded by psycho ramblings and babbling about witches and other insanity, they should be able to see
that this woman is clearly not of sound mind so anything she says such as knowing him is not credible.. I could see why they want him make a statement about it
but I think that her incoherent filing should be taken into account as fact that this woman has a mental condition.
|
||
|
bigley22 |
|||
|
Posts: 14119 (11/07/2009 12:48 PM) |
^Yeah it doesn't make sense to me either. Oh ok. I was thinking that he was at home at the time? I don't think the bodyguards should have said anything because the whole story just loses all credibility for me. And why were the security at home and not with Justin? Unless he already had extra security with him? None of this makes sense. What doesn't make sense? The people who testified were his security people who watch his house, not his regular bodyguards. His regular bodyguards were with him. The people who watch his house are the ones who testified about the lady being on his property and what she said and did. I'm sure his lawyer got a written statement from Justin that he does not know the woman and then told him he didn't need to appear in person. I agree with the lawyer, Justin knows nothing about what went down. The testimony from those who were actually there and his written statement should be enough I would think. |
||
|
blair4990 |
|||
|
Posts: 17643 (11/07/2009 12:53 PM) |
I'm pretty sure he still has to deny any knowledge of her even though her ramblings indicate huge psychological problems. Just because she seems crazy
doesn't mean Justin has no personal knowledge of her. He's going t have to deny that knowledge in court. Did he get a new judge? I couldn't tell
from the article.
|
||
|
BlairWaldorf |
|||
|
Posts: 1967 (11/07/2009 12:54 PM) |
I think TMZ used the word bodyguards instead of security personnel. He has people from a security company, watch his house to make sure there aren't break
ins or people like this woman. They are the ones that testified because they were there for the incidents. All they can get from him is the confirmation that
he does not know her which was already stated.
|
||
|
blair4990 |
|||
|
Posts: 17644 (11/07/2009 12:55 PM) |
Does anyone know if this nutcase has ever attempted to get close to Justin anyplace but at his home?
|
||
|
BlairWaldorf |
|||
|
Posts: 1968 (11/07/2009 12:58 PM) |
It wasn't reported, if she did, I'm sure it would have been stated.
|
||
|
blair4990 |
|||
|
Posts: 17645 (11/07/2009 1:02 PM) |
So if Justin wants a RO for his personal self I think he has to deal with it. As far as the judge knows she has only been to his home when he wasn't there.
Maybe they could issue the RO for his home but then the only place he'd be safe from her was when he was home. And what good would that do? She claims a
personal relationship with Justin and he has to deny it.
|
||
Quick Reply
