?
How come people back in the 1800s didn't have acne?
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 ravioli |
How come people back in the 1800s didn't have acne? |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 2273 (07/02/2009 9:32 PM) |
|
||
|
LaNcEsOnLyGiRLy |
|||
|
Posts: 23077 (07/02/2009 9:32 PM) |
I'm sure they did you just can't see it in the pictures.
|
||
|
MegaBabe717 |
|||
|
Posts: 10046 (07/02/2009 9:38 PM) |
|
||
|
muah |
|||
|
Posts: 1554 (07/02/2009 9:40 PM) |
They did! They did not have 90-megapixel cameras.
|
||
|
MilkWasABadChoice |
|||
|
Posts: 9796 (07/02/2009 9:46 PM) |
They did too. I was there.
|
||
|
Juicy07 |
|||
|
Posts: 6943 (07/02/2009 9:47 PM) |
loveblades19 wrote:
|
||
|
ravioli |
|||
|
Posts: 2274 (07/02/2009 9:49 PM) |
nevermind i just found this thread lol
http://www.acne.org/messageboard/people-periods-histor-t175084.html |
||
|
ravioli |
|||
|
Posts: 2275 (07/02/2009 9:50 PM) |
VeraWango wrote: It's my middle name (and a family name). I've made a post about it before. Keep up. |
||
|
Purplelilac82 |
|||
|
Posts: 15518 (07/02/2009 9:51 PM) |
Juicy07 wrote: As a sidenote, every person I've seen with MAC makeup on, they just look heavy and gross 
|
||
|
Anticipation19 |
|||
|
Posts: 16801 (07/02/2009 9:54 PM) |
muah wrote: I was gonna say this!
|
||
|
babylulu |
|||
|
Posts: 26410 (07/02/2009 10:11 PM) |
Rosie Rathbone wrote: this is probably true!
There were apothecaries back in the day and that was where they got the stuff to get rid of their acne. That shit wasn't diluted like the stuff we use today (I'm assuming the shit is diluted) so it probably cleared the acne and the other blemishes pretty darn fast. |
||
|
foto87 |
|||
|
Posts: 7694 (07/02/2009 10:20 PM) |
VeraWango wrote: omg
|
||
|
x Pahk The Cah x |
|||
|
Posts: 15525 (07/02/2009 10:21 PM) |
The 90 lbs of powder they used on their faces covered any spots up, I'm sure.
|
||
|
Donald Draper.niketalk |
|||
|
Posts: 1096 (07/02/2009 10:58 PM) |
Less pollution, fast food, toxins in the water/food supply, etc.
|
||
|
OCcaligirl |
|||
|
Posts: 6054 (07/02/2009 11:02 PM) |
loveblades19 wrote:Word. |
||
|
westernway09 |
|||
|
Posts: 939 (07/02/2009 11:11 PM) |
OCcaligirl wrote: It's really that bad? What foundation is better? |
||
|
Marydoll512 |
|||
|
Posts: 3614 (07/02/2009 11:14 PM) |
Well all the pics you would see are those of Glamor shots or portraits, you never saw candids or pooparazzo shots of celebs/people
|
||
|
Glory Glory Hallelujah |
|||
|
Posts: 25548 (07/02/2009 11:15 PM) JJBer of the Year '06
|
VeraWango wrote:That's so rude, but 
|
||
Quick Reply
