Debbie Rowe does want custody of Prince & Paris

RSS
Email

0 Kudo

Started By	Comment
selfish love		#21	[-]
Posts: 12899 (07/02/2009 1:22 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	chocolatemama88 wrote: She needs to sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up. What a nasty trick. Couldn't have said it better myself.
dawn9476		#22	[-]
Posts: 22870 (07/02/2009 1:22 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	moussemaker wrote: IF she is their biological mother she might have a chance. And if she is ruled a fit parent. But that being said, if she really wanted them, she would have already filed a petition for custody, not be yapping to the press.
Gizzo013		#23	[-]
Posts: 400 (07/02/2009 1:22 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	A very slim chance. Like it has been stated a few times, this woman basically had these kids for money.
JellyRoll2		#24	[-]
Posts: 16422 (07/02/2009 1:22 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	moussemaker wrote: IF she is their biological mother she might have a chance. Then isn't that looking out for the best interest of the parent and not the children? Biology does not make someone a parent. Their nanny was much more of a mother to them then Debbie ever was.
TYCP Sha		#25	[-]
Posts: 97251 (07/02/2009 1:22 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	It's pretty messed up of her to do this now. If Michael hadn't died, she wouldn't be saying shit.
magnoliam		#26	[-]
Posts: 4444 (07/02/2009 1:22 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	well, not that I don't think she is a money grubbin' biotch, BUT if I gave up two kids through surrogate to one person the circumstance being that I loved them and wanted them to have kids, and then they were to pass away, I might want them back, knowing they would no longer be raised by that one person. however, this should have been ironed out BEFORE giving up any kids of coarse
bigredmunkeebutt		#27	[-]
Posts: 13792 (07/02/2009 1:23 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	She wants MONEY, period. Wait and see, she'll ''come to an agreement'' with the Jacksons, and walk away with a few more million.
berg123		#28	[-]
Posts: 745 (07/02/2009 1:25 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Back off, bitch!
SwanGeese		#29	[-]
Posts: 5969 (07/02/2009 1:25 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	bigredmunkeebutt wrote: She wants MONEY, period. Wait and see, she'll ''come to an agreement'' with the Jacksons, and walk away with a few more million. Yep. I also think that the children should not be split up.
PassionFruit		#30	[-]
Posts: 1915 (07/02/2009 1:25 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	SwanGeese wrote: bigredmunkeebutt wrote: She wants MONEY, period. Wait and see, she'll ''come to an agreement'' with the Jacksons, and walk away with a few more million. Yep. I also think that the children should not be split up.
JellyRoll2		#31	[-]
Posts: 16423 (07/02/2009 1:26 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	magnoliam wrote: well, not that I don't think she is a money grubbin' biotch, BUT if I gave up two kids through surrogate to one person the circumstance being that I loved them and wanted them to have kids, and then they were to pass away, I might want them back, knowing they would no longer be raised by that one person. however, this should have been ironed out BEFORE giving up any kids of coarse That could be understandable if she'd had some sort of contact with those children in their lifetime. Or, like you say, that's worked out before hand. She has no relationship with them. This just makes me so unbelievably angry.
this blondes 4 u		#32	[-]
Posts: 2979 (07/02/2009 1:28 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Kramer vs. Kramer Guess who won custody
99thdegree		#33	[-]
Posts: 29105 (07/02/2009 1:30 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	. Edited By: 99thdegree 07/02/2009 1:33 PM. Edited 1 times.
JosephKin18.kellyclarksonex...		#34	[-]
Posts: 396 (07/02/2009 1:30 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	dawn9476 wrote: Debbie Rowe wants custody of the two children she had with Michael Jackson. "I want my children," Rowe said during a 90-minute phone conversation Thursday morning with NBCLA's Chuck Henry. Rowe said she was willing to submit to any testing, including DNA to prove that she is the children's true biological mother. Rowe also said she would submit to psychological testing. She also said she would seek a restraining order to keep Jackson's father, Joe Jackson, away from the children. The agreement does allow for visition, but Rowe said it's a very difficult process. Jackson, who died at age 50, left behind three children: son Michael Joseph Jr., known as Prince Michael, 12; daughter Paris Michael Katherine, 11; and son Prince Michael II, 7. Rowe was the mother of the two oldest children. The youngest was born to a surrogate mother, who has never been identified. Rowe said she was concerned about splitting up the children. Rowe, who was married to Jackson in 1996 and filed for divorce three years later, surrendered her parental rights. An appeals court later found that was done in error, and Rowe and Jackson entered an out-of-court settlement in 2006. http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Debbie-Rowe-I-Want-My-Children.html She needs to step off!
dawn9476		#35	[-]
Posts: 22871 (07/02/2009 1:31 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	99thdegree wrote: Debbie Rowe wants custody of the two children she had with Michael Jackson. "I want my children," Rowe said during a 90-minute phone conversation Thursday morning with NBCLA's Chuck Henry. Rowe said she was willing to submit to any testing, including DNA to prove that she is the children's true biological mother. Rowe also said she would submit to psychological testing. She also said she would seek a restraining order to keep Jackson's father, Joe Jackson, away from the children. The agreement does allow for visition, but Rowe said it's a very difficult process. Jackson, who died at age 50, left behind three children: son Michael Joseph Jr., known as Prince Michael, 12; daughter Paris Michael Katherine, 11; and son Prince Michael II, 7. Rowe was the mother of the two oldest children. The youngest was born to a surrogate mother, who has never been identified. Rowe said she was concerned about splitting up the children. Rowe, who was married to Jackson in 1996 and filed for divorce three years later, surrendered her parental rights. An appeals court later found that was done in error, and Rowe and Jackson entered an out-of-court settlement in 2006. From ONTD That's the same thing I posted earlier in the thread.
99thdegree		#36	[-]
Posts: 29106 (07/02/2009 1:32 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Sorry Dawn. I'll delete.
Jenna1983		#37	[-]
Posts: 20139 (07/02/2009 1:33 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Yeah but the money is set up in a Jackson Family trust. It's quite possible those kids wouldn't even be able to touch the money for a long time. I'm sure there are stipulations there is X money for the children to be raised. Who knows what will happen. She says one thing, Michael said another. We have no idea what really went on. Never truly will.
SusieMC		#38	[-]
Posts: 631 (07/02/2009 1:36 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	One of the legal analysts on CNN yesterday stated it would weigh heavily in court on the wishes of the children and who they wanted to be with. They are old enough to choose. I'm not saying that I believe that is what would happen....but the children will most likely have a say.
oohykitten		#39	[-]
Posts: 14545 (07/02/2009 1:36 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Oh well I guess I am the only one that agrees with her concern over Joe Jackson.
soupy		#40	[-]
Posts: 625 (07/02/2009 1:37 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	They've discussed this on various shows and all the lawyers have said that although she stands a chance of getting custody everything would come into evidence in a custody hearing. All the tapes of her saying the kids were a gift. That she didn't want to be the parent, that she was settled money for them. They also said the children were also old enough to let their wishes be known of who they wanted to live with. They said they would hold alot of weight with the judge. So if there is justice in this world she won't get them and won't get a dime from them.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Yuku free message boards

Debbie Rowe does want custody of Prince & Paris

Quick Reply