Thoughts?
Do you think Diana Ross will fight for the kids?
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 RandomnessRocks22 |
Do you think Diana Ross will fight for the kids? |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 12065 (07/01/2009 12:28 PM) Most Random '08 |
|
||
|
jawnyquest.niketalk |
|||
|
Posts: 1321 (07/01/2009 12:29 PM) Best Use of Emoticon award '09
|
uhm..what
|
||
 vivalavix |
|||
|
Posts: 24371 (07/01/2009 12:30 PM) |
What?
|
||
|
Darling Nikki33 |
|||
|
Posts: 3537 (07/01/2009 12:30 PM) |
You are consistent! That's for damn sure. |
||
|
ThymeIn |
|||
|
Posts: 1239 (07/01/2009 12:30 PM) |
No, but Elisabeth Taylor will.
|
||
|
LuvBug |
|||
|
Posts: 3510 (07/01/2009 12:32 PM) |
What kids?
|
||
|
Layfray21 |
|||
|
Posts: 8766 (07/01/2009 12:32 PM) |
...
|
||
|
RayK3193 |
|||
|
Posts: 2382 (07/01/2009 12:33 PM) |
|
||
|
blairboy |
|||
|
Posts: 34059 (07/01/2009 12:34 PM)
|
WHY would she? She's SECONDARY.
His Mother has the kids, that's where he wanted them. Let this go. |
||
|
moussemaker |
|||
|
Posts: 18285 (07/01/2009 12:42 PM) |
|
||
|
FuGirl82 |
|||
|
Posts: 11237 (07/01/2009 12:44 PM) |
How could she fight for the kids? The Will states that if his mother is not living or does not/can not provide for them then Diana gets them. She has no way to
fight it seeing that Katherine WANTS the kids.
|
||
|
raratwentyfour |
|||
|
Posts: 3168 (07/01/2009 12:46 PM) |
|
||
|
orangepeel19 |
|||
|
Posts: 12281 (07/01/2009 12:51 PM) Friendliest JJBer '09
|
Awww in his will, they go to Diana Ross as a secondary measure?? That's so cute!
|
||
|
raratwentyfour |
|||
|
Posts: 3171 (07/01/2009 12:58 PM) |
FuGirl82 wrote:Oops I didn't see that. Do we have a proven source? I can't imagine him skipping all of his brothers and sisters to give them to Diana Ross. |
||
|
franknbeans82 |
|||
|
Posts: 30906 (07/01/2009 1:20 PM) |
is there a reason why diana would get them? is she listed in the will as a possible guardian or something?
|
||
|
moussemaker |
|||
|
Posts: 18287 (07/01/2009 1:26 PM) |
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/michael-jackson/5712736/Michael-Jackson-Diana-Ross-named-as-childrens-guardian.html
In his five-page will, which has been registered in Los Angeles County Superior Court, he leaves his £303 million ($500million) estate in a trust for his children. He states that his 79-year-old mother, Katherine, should be carer for his three children, Prince Michael I, 12; Paris, 11, and Prince Michael II, seven.
It said that should his mother be unable to look after their children, then Diana Ross, 65, his mentor, should be their guardian. The will was made on July 7, 2002 and three associates for Jackson - attorney John Branca, John McClain and Barry Siegel - are named co-executors of the will. It also states that he chose not to provide for his former wife Debbie Rowe. The documents said Jackson's estate consisted almost entirely of "non-cash, non-liquid assets, including primarily an interest in a catalogue of music royalty rights which is currently being administered by Sony ATV, and the interests of various entities." The Sony ATV deal includes the Beatles back catalogue. |
||
|
ATL senorita |
|||
|
Posts: 2372 (07/01/2009 1:26 PM) |
Bubbles, his chimp had filed for legal guardianship of the children.
His llama had also asked for partial custody. Bubbles has agreed. Its settled Weriiid. |
||
|
franknbeans82 |
|||
|
Posts: 30907 (07/01/2009 1:52 PM) |
moussemaker wrote:Thanks! |
||
|
franknbeans82 |
|||
|
Posts: 30908 (07/01/2009 1:52 PM) |
moussemaker wrote:Thanks! |
||
|
timberspears |
|||
|
Posts: 19755 (07/01/2009 2:05 PM) |
raratwentyfour wrote: 
|
||
|
bigredmunkeebutt |
|||
|
Posts: 13772 (07/01/2009 2:17 PM) |
I find it really weird that MJ wouldn't think of someone younger as a potential guardian for those kids. Seriously, his mom is about 80, and Diana Ross is
in her late 60's.
|
||
Quick Reply
