| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 dawn9476 |
Minnesota’s Supreme Court declares Franken winner |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 22815 (06/30/2009 1:20 PM) |
http://cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/30/minnesotas-supreme-court-declares-franken-winner/    
|
||
|
bigredmunkeebutt |
|||
|
Posts: 13732 (06/30/2009 1:22 PM) |
It's about time!
|
||
|
ImFreakinTired69 |
|||
|
Posts: 39380 (06/30/2009 1:22 PM) |
finally. I feel like it has been 50 years
|
||
|
Alex the Goob |
|||
|
Posts: 50583 (06/30/2009 1:23 PM) |
DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But YAY! 
|
||
|
the lakes slave |
|||
|
Posts: 62464 (06/30/2009 1:23 PM) |
I wonder what Republicans will do next to screw over Minnesotans ever longer.
|
||
|
mntwinsfan05 |
|||
|
Posts: 3495 (06/30/2009 1:23 PM) |
Boo. I guess we'll see how well it goes.
|
||
|
talksalot83 |
|||
|
Posts: 88748 (06/30/2009 1:25 PM)
|
Sign the election certificate, Pawlenty!
|
||
|
dawn9476 |
|||
|
Posts: 22817 (06/30/2009 1:26 PM) |
talksalot83 wrote:He better sign it. |
||
|
JaimJaim |
|||
|
Posts: 24413 (06/30/2009 1:26 PM) |
Pawlenty said he would sign it if the Minnesota SC ruled in Franken's favor. He wants that nom in 2012.
|
||
|
LisaChasez |
|||
|
Posts: 109130 (06/30/2009 1:27 PM) JC Fanatic '03
|
lol, I hope they went "Frankens the winner because he's good enough, smart enough and gosh darn't, people LIKE him!
|
||
|
talksalot83 |
|||
|
Posts: 88750 (06/30/2009 1:28 PM)
|
JaimJaim wrote: Pawlenty is a d-bag and I don't trust him. Even though I think he'll sign it, I still don't like him or trust him. |
||
|
talksalot83 |
|||
|
Posts: 88751 (06/30/2009 1:28 PM)
|
Double post
Edited By: talksalot83
06/30/2009 1:36 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
rachaelthinksbeesareokay |
|||
|
Posts: 2490 (06/30/2009 1:34 PM) Grammar Cop '09
|
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!
|
||
|
melloo |
|||
|
Posts: 2885 (06/30/2009 1:35 PM) |
He better sign it. This whole thing is beyond ridiculous.
|
||
|
blairboy |
|||
|
Posts: 34041 (06/30/2009 1:37 PM)
|
They just can't deal with the fact that Franken won fair and square.
|
||
|
mntwinsfan05 |
|||
|
Posts: 3496 (06/30/2009 1:41 PM) |
blairboy wrote: Technically Coleman was declared the winner back in Nov. and then Franken was a sore loser who was every fucking ballot gone through. I mean seriously if you listened to half of the shit that he (Franken) fought then you'd be like WTF. I am just thankful this won't be on the news every night. |
||
|
Jillio19 |
|||
|
Posts: 47381 (06/30/2009 1:43 PM) |
LisaChasez wrote:  That's all I think of when I see him.
|
||
|
franknbeans82 |
|||
|
Posts: 30870 (06/30/2009 1:44 PM) |
mntwinsfan05 wrote: I don't see why it makes him a sore loser to want to ensure that the outcome was accurate. I'm glad to know peoples ballots actually count. |
||
|
talksalot83 |
|||
|
Posts: 88753 (06/30/2009 1:45 PM)
|
mntwinsfan05 wrote: Wrong. Because of the small margin, the state is required to do a recount and there should have never been a winner declared that night because of the small margin and a pending recount. Plus, at that time, there were still absentee ballots that needed to be counted. |
||
|
the lakes slave |
|||
|
Posts: 62465 (06/30/2009 1:47 PM) |
mntwinsfan05 wrote:No you moron. It was REQUIRED that the state do a recount, due to how small the margin was. |
||
|
dawn9476 |
|||
|
Posts: 22820 (06/30/2009 1:49 PM) |
talksalot83 wrote: Exactly. The state had to do a recount by law regardless. |
||
