If I didn't have to pay off my college loans, then possibly. I'd probably go for a pair of $1,000 shoes first.
If you had it, would you spend $1000.....
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 popdontstop7684 |
|||
|
Posts: 3751 (06/27/2009 1:09 PM) |
|
||
|
GoofyDawg0810 |
|||
|
Posts: 28607 (06/27/2009 1:10 PM) |
No. I'd pay for rent for 3 months. Or pay 2 months of student loan payments. Or buy things like food and gas for my car. Fuck expensive ugly purses.
|
||
|
LadyK81988 |
|||
|
Posts: 25582 (06/27/2009 1:14 PM) |
No, even if I was filthy rich. Buying a bag for that much money just wouldn't make sense to me.
|
||
|
Juicy07 |
|||
|
Posts: 6894 (06/27/2009 1:22 PM) |
AngelsTearDrop wrote:It's not, though. Designer handbags holds its value when you try to sell them on ebay or whatever if you take good care of them. I haven't spend a grand plus on them, but I would just b/c I know I could get most of my money back on them if I need the money. |
||
|
StrawberryCoke |
|||
|
Posts: 1465 (06/27/2009 1:23 PM) |
YES, I have no debt so why not.
|
||
|
Savannah Leigh |
|||
|
Posts: 1341 (06/27/2009 1:24 PM) Most Likely to Reply '09
|
I have a white Balenciaga bag, but I didnt pay for it. I don't I would spend my own money on anything that expensive.
|
||
|
Kit505 |
|||
|
Posts: 8558 (06/27/2009 1:26 PM) |
no
|
||
|
chocolate covered raisins |
|||
|
Posts: 29916 (06/27/2009 1:27 PM) Chris Fanatic '03 |
Not on a handbag, but there are other things I would drop a grand on.
|
||
|
JustMusic101 |
|||
|
Posts: 14843 (06/27/2009 1:27 PM) |
If I had it, wouldn't hurt if I splurged? Basically if I were a celeb? Probably if I really liked the bag.
|
||
 waitwhat |
|||
|
Posts: 1035 (06/27/2009 1:28 PM) |
I'm going to be $200 k in debt when I graduate, so that would be a no.
|
||
|
FSCgrl83 |
|||
|
Posts: 51451 (06/27/2009 1:42 PM)
|
no
|
||
|
bigredmunkeebutt |
|||
|
Posts: 13698 (06/27/2009 1:49 PM) |
No. I just couldn't bring myself to waste money on something that frivolous. I just don't need a $1000 bag.
|
||
|
princessjrt |
|||
|
Posts: 2496 (06/27/2009 1:51 PM) |
Only for Chanel
|
||
|
AngelsTearDrop |
|||
|
Posts: 21474 (06/27/2009 1:54 PM) |
Juicy07 wrote: You'd probably lose at least 100 on the sale, though. I wouldn't even spend that much on a purse. So, to me, yes it is a waste. 
|
||
|
Kwis77 |
|||
|
Posts: 17830 (06/27/2009 1:54 PM) |
No, I truly don't think I would. Well, maybe if I was a billionaire.
|
||
|
makesJCadjustHisbuttonfly |
|||
|
Posts: 15863 (06/27/2009 1:58 PM) |
Hell no! I don't care for handbags. I use one till it breaks then buy another one and the most I'll spend is $40
More important things to spend
money on.
|
||
|
RollerGirl19 |
|||
|
Posts: 11324 (06/27/2009 1:58 PM) |
Yes, if it were a classic black bag I could good use out of. I bought a dior wallet several years ago and I still use it. That's the plus about designer
accessories, they don't fall apart. I would have gone through probably 4 different cheap wallets by now, and surprisingly I haven't gotten sick of this
one yet.
|
||
|
DoesThatSparkle |
|||
|
Posts: 2862 (06/27/2009 2:05 PM) |
I never understand when people say things like "I have more important things to spend my money on, thats so stupid." Everybody has things they are
willing to spend $$ on. For some people it's electronics, others it's food, vacations etc. Nobody would say it was stupid or a waste of money if
someone bought a flat screen tv or some type of new gaming system. But when somebody buys a purse then all hell breaks loose and its "stupid."
|
||
|
RollerGirl19 |
|||
|
Posts: 11326 (06/27/2009 2:08 PM) |
oh kellydoll
|
||
|
DoesThatSparkle |
|||
|
Posts: 2864 (06/27/2009 2:12 PM) |
Is there a problem?
|
||
Quick Reply
