If the kids go with her, Blanket will not be with his siblings, that's just wrong. I think it's also not fair to say just because of the
Grandfather's past, the kids shouldn't stay with them. Maybe he changed. None of us know. Hell, I even remember reading a huge article with him saying
he knows what he did wrong, and if he could he'd do it over the right way. *shrugs*
This talk about MJ's kids...
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 blairboy |
|||
|
Posts: 33937 (06/26/2009 8:02 PM)
|
|
||
 vividthoughts |
|||
|
Posts: 4520 (06/26/2009 8:04 PM) |
I thought Joe Jackson isn't wasn't involved with the family anymore. I think they should go with
the eldest sister Rebbie or Marlon...they seem to have the most normal stable home life. Whatever is the
outcome I just hope the kids will be well taken care of.
edited - because I didn't like using the word normal.
Edited By: vividthoughts
06/26/2009 8:27 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
guesswhatelse |
|||
|
Posts: 26549 (06/26/2009 8:04 PM) |
EndlessNameless wrote:If one more person says this shit...  I'm trying to figure out why this even matters. Those are his children.
Point blank. Period. There's no more to talk about. 
|
||
|
blairboy |
|||
|
Posts: 33938 (06/26/2009 8:04 PM)
|
guesswhatelse wrote: Agree 100%. |
||
|
guesswhatelse |
|||
|
Posts: 26550 (06/26/2009 8:05 PM) |
vividthoughts wrote:He definitely does. I saw pictures of him and the rest of the family (sans Michael and his three) last week. They were at Latoya's bday party. |
||
|
EndlessNameless |
|||
|
Posts: 3975 (06/26/2009 8:06 PM) |
Well at least those poor kids can have a chance at a normal life now
|
||
|
Jess116005 |
|||
|
Posts: 21560 (06/26/2009 8:17 PM) |
Who is the youngest kid's mother?
|
||
|
Jess116005 |
|||
|
Posts: 21561 (06/26/2009 8:17 PM) |
Who is the youngest kid's mother?
|
||
|
TYCP Sha |
|||
|
Posts: 97153 (06/26/2009 8:24 PM) |
EndlessNameless wrote: Just stop. |
||
|
beklah324 |
|||
|
Posts: 23356 (06/26/2009 8:25 PM) |
imyourfairygodmother wrote:My mom was just listening to that. I didn't hear it and she wasn't really paying that much attention but thought she had said this person is known amongst close family/friends and that it was someone close to MJ ?? Is that what she said? I wonder if we'll ever find out. EndlessNameless wrote:So. They are his children, whether it was his sperm or not. |
||
|
blairboy |
|||
|
Posts: 33939 (06/26/2009 8:37 PM)
|
EndlessNameless wrote: Shut up. |
||
|
dubjj07 |
|||
|
Posts: 2281 (06/26/2009 11:54 PM) |
I really wouldn't be surprised if the kids went to Janet. She may be an odd choice, but she was probably the closest person to him
|
||
|
PassionFruit |
|||
|
Posts: 1891 (06/27/2009 12:00 AM) |
dubjj07 wrote: I think she would be great to them. I just hope those kids don't get separated. |
||
|
dubjj07 |
|||
|
Posts: 2282 (06/27/2009 12:06 AM) |
PassionFruit wrote: She's who I'd really really want for the kids. And I bet money on it they won't get separated. But Mike probably got the situation on lock |
||
|
kastang |
|||
|
Posts: 201 (06/27/2009 12:21 AM) |
They're life seemed pretty normal. I mean, if I ever saw them in public without their masks, I would've never noticed them.
|
||
|
oohykitten |
|||
|
Posts: 14511 (06/27/2009 12:26 AM) |
I just dont get why everyone is jumping on Debbie Rowe...do it once she has done something wrong...not till then. She loved him and has for the most part from
what I know repected his wants, I dont get why you think she wouldn't now.
|
||
|
SusieMC |
|||
|
Posts: 495 (06/27/2009 12:33 AM) |
Like I said in the other thread.....he made sure those children were protected at every turn.....I'm quite sure he did the same in his will. His family was
also ridiculously supportive of him in everything he did and will make sure his wishes are carried out where his children are concerned since their happiness
was his #1 priority at all times.
I also think the 100 songs he left to them was his way of making sure they would be monetarily taken care of. He was not a stupid man where his career was concerned in any way. He knows all too well that if the children make the last resort choice to release those songs, they will be billionaires in a matter of 10 minutes. |
||
|
Samantha James |
|||
|
Posts: 14316 (06/27/2009 12:45 AM) |
blairboy wrote:  When you fuck up the way he did and abuse your kids the way that he did, you don't get a second chance. You don't deserve a second
chance. You don't put 3 children in a potentially unstable and unsafe situation based on what someone wishes he could do or had done. Are you on crack?
I don't know much about the kids' moms but unless they're unstable and unfit, the kids should go to their moms. That doesn't mean that they won't see each other or know each other or have a presence in each other's lives. It just means that all 3 of them won't live in the same home. It may seem unfair to split the kids up but it's, also, unfair to not grant custody to the moms just for the sake of keeping the kids together. And it wouldn't be fair to automatically grant custody of all the kids to Michael's mom or sister, etc when the kids have grandparents and aunts and uncles on the other side of their family. I know my opinion is very unpopular here but I'm just saying. Long term, putting all the kids in one place might not be the fairest thing to everyone involved. I feel bad for the kids, I really do. But to give them to extended family or only consider giving custody to MJ's family might not be in their best interest necessarily. 
BB, I'm not just talking to you. I'm talking to a bunch of people. 
|
||
|
kastang |
|||
|
Posts: 203 (06/27/2009 12:49 AM) |
Well the difference between the older 2 and the youngest is that his "mom" was an unknown donor/surrogate.
So either way, where is Blanket going?? |
||
|
Mistress Darcy |
|||
|
Posts: 9901 (06/27/2009 12:55 AM) |
Samantha James wrote:But, handing them over to a Mom who signed over all rights and never attempted to see them is not necessarily in their best interests either. It is a difficult question and I have no idea what will happen. I do think splitting them up should be avoided if at all humanly possible. If you want more psychological damage than having a father die suddenly on them that is the way to go. |
||
Quick Reply
