And now we're back where we started, she hasn't made a mark on anything.
Jessica Biel: "I've made a mark"
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 vivalavix |
|||
|
Posts: 23633 (06/06/2009 11:23 PM) |
|
||
|
AtomicDaisy |
|||
|
Posts: 5538 (06/06/2009 11:26 PM) |
Love her and I think she looks amazing on that cover.
Carry on... |
||
 oliverbandit |
|||
|
Posts: 7516 (06/06/2009 11:26 PM) |
I don't follow her but I refuse to believe she meant she puts herself in the same category of Angelina, Halle, or Charlize. Maybe she means her mark is
similar to Megan Fox or Olivia Wilde. You know sexy but probably won't be remembered 50 years from now.
|
||
|
Jloveandjlo |
|||
|
Posts: 5547 (06/06/2009 11:26 PM) |
WhiskeyWhispers wrote: I do have to agree with this |
||
|
bigley22 |
|||
|
Posts: 13514 (06/06/2009 11:28 PM) |
That sure sounds like someone thinks making the top of the Maxim list is a GOOD thing, because "not all actresses" doI don't think there's anything particularly great about any of those lists, including Maxim. I was just using it as an example of the type of lists she gets mentioned on. Just like People magazine and all the other publications that feel the need to make lists, it's a bunch of people's opinions, none of which really matter and none of which have anything to do with actual talent. I would need to read the whole article to get a feeling if she actually thinks she's made a mark on anything. It's really hard to tell without seeing the actual question and answers in context. |
||
|
end of a century |
|||
|
Posts: 418 (06/06/2009 11:31 PM) |
idk... that part sounded sarcastic to me
|
||
|
NickelodeonSucksLoL |
|||
|
Posts: 4321 (06/06/2009 11:32 PM) |
WhiskeyWhispers wrote:Okay, we agree here. And I agree with you too, bigley. I'd have to read the entire article, but I'm probably not gonna since Gotham mag isn't exactly a grocery store mag and I'm definitely not going to Borders or B&N to read it.  Hell to the naw!
|
||
|
Nancy White |
|||
|
Posts: 2519 (06/07/2009 1:27 AM) |
really, Jessica, really?
|
||
|
kandii |
|||
|
Posts: 142 (06/07/2009 2:55 AM) |
How do she and Justin fit their overblown egos and big heads in the same room? She also has sais she is too pretty and it hurts her getting roles! She has a
fugly face, and her body is mostly a shelf ass and no boobs to proportion her ass. Plus she is not a good actress. At least Justin's big ego is based on
the fact he is talented. And as skanky as Meghan fox is, she is sexy, unlike Jessica who needs tons of make up or photoshop, or she is average.
|
||
|
Meli |
|||
|
Posts: 897 (06/07/2009 5:42 AM) |
kandii wrote: 
|
||
|
Rumple Teaser |
|||
|
Posts: 114 (06/07/2009 6:34 AM) |
honeyheart wrote: ditto. |
||
|
IloveJoshuaandJustin |
|||
|
Posts: 312 (06/07/2009 7:47 AM) |
Theres really no point in arguing with people who've already made up they're minds, why what she says and does bothers some of you so much is the part
I don't get.
|
||
|
purplepassions1 |
|||
|
Posts: 151 (06/07/2009 9:24 AM) |
Justin must be good for her ego. I imagine he has been telling her how beautiful he thinks she is because never before have I heard this woman talk about how
beautiful she is in almost every interview that she does. It's become beyond annoying.
|
||
|
eres |
|||
|
Posts: 308 (06/07/2009 9:29 AM) |
She hasn't made a mark in the industry or as sex symbol. Everybody knows that Esquire Sexiest Woman Alive bullshit was bought and paid for by her ever so
hard working publicist.
When I think of current sex symbols I think of Angelina, Scarlett Johansson, Jessica Alba, Megan Fox, etc. Jessica Biel is hardly even talked about or mentioned in the same breath as those ladies. |
||
|
blair4990 |
|||
|
Posts: 17210 (06/07/2009 9:52 AM) |
purplepassions1 wrote: 
|
||
|
jbela |
|||
|
Posts: 322 (06/07/2009 10:57 AM) |
JustBrit2007 wrote: Seriously! But i think she already complained about being taken seriously as an actress. 
|
||
|
peanutcup |
|||
|
Posts: 12 (06/07/2009 12:51 PM) |
She really thinks she has made her mark as some sex symbol?
Didn't she also say she is too pretty to get roles?
I hate to break it to her, but Maxim's list consists of people who have agents that pay or push them on the list, and most are totally not even on the mainstream sexy list. Basically it's a bunch of horny men rating tits and ass. I would hardly call it "making a mark" on anything! Her movie and TV roles are pretty lame. Even Meghan has a huge franchise of movies in Transformers to link her name on. Seriously she is dellusional and I agree she and Justin both seem conceited as hell, but at least he has some reason to be full of himself. And when you look like this in everyday life, I would not call yourself "too pretty". Meghan and many others look way better in everyday life. Basically Jessica has not made her mark in anyway except dating an A lister. |
||
|
kandii |
|||
|
Posts: 143 (06/07/2009 12:53 PM) |
So this is "too pretty", and has made her mark as a sex symbol? Okay!
 |
||
|
insomniachollie |
|||
|
Posts: 40133 (06/07/2009 1:17 PM) Best Fan Fic Writer '08 |
I don't think she realises how she comes off when she says things like this. It's not good
|
||
|
suese |
|||
|
Posts: 8538 (06/07/2009 2:49 PM) |
She did some sort of Playboy spread when she wanted to distance herself from "7th Heaven" didn't she?
So, it stands to reason that she values being considered a "sex" symbol to being a good actress. Too bad. She's neither in my book. |
||
Quick Reply
