| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 ravendel |
|||
|
Posts: 47 (12/13/2008 6:14 AM) |
meyoumeU wrote:Better for him, at least he has a quality movie to sell. Better to pose naked to sell a film of family, Aniston is now a symbol of how to be a whore in America. 
|
||
|
sparkle2008 |
|||
|
Posts: 164 (12/13/2008 11:10 AM) |
Nope, Mangie sewed that title up for herself years ago.
I don't see how her showing her tits in W mag was art. It was more of the same narcissistic exhibitionism and shameless famewhoring that Brangelina have come to be know for. |
||
|
cabbagedoll |
|||
|
Posts: 112 (12/13/2008 12:02 PM) |
hallefan82 wrote:I couldn't have said it better myself. Better for him, at least he has a quality movie to sell. Better to pose naked to sell a film of family, Aniston is now a symbol of how to be a whore in America.Right now Jen is in company of ho' like Carmen E and Kim K and pretty soon she will be the next has-been ho like Pam A. Enough said? |
||
|
humanlove02 |
|||
|
Posts: 3000 (12/13/2008 12:37 PM) |
LOL at comparing ass-scene in Wanted to thise porno-like shots! So i guess there is no difference between Playboy girls and Hollywood mainstream actresses
since all are doing nude scenes. It's the "exact same thing", Ok i get it now
|
||
|
cabbagedoll |
|||
|
Posts: 114 (12/13/2008 8:31 PM) |
Jennifer Aniston Has No Clothes
First of all, I'd like to apologize to all you fans of Jennifer Aniston out there who continue to find solace in this woman's wooden acting and lackluster films and her now four-year crusade to let Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt know she's nonplussed about the whole cheating/marriage break-up thing. But it must be noted for posterity that Aniston, of whom I am terminally sick, has made an uncharacteristically risky move. Or, risky for her. In the onslaught of promotion leading up to the release of her newest acting challenge, "Marley & Me," Jen has played the nearly-naked magazine spread card. A tactic, as I'm sure you're well aware, often employed by actresses struggling to spin their way out of scandal, irrelevancy and advancing age Sex still sells, but context is everything, Jen. And juxtaposed with the release of a feel good "family" movie, the whole thing just has the smell of naked (ahem) ambition. Or desperation. Or a little of both. http://voices.washingtonp...niston_has_no_clothe.html |
||
|
lanorchid |
|||
|
Posts: 385 (12/13/2008 8:53 PM) |
cabbagedoll wrote: |
||
 dawn9476 |
|||
|
Posts: 15797 (12/13/2008 10:54 PM) |
For the fricking last time about movie promotion. She has ANOTHER MOVIE COMING OUT IN FEBRUARY. One that chicks of men, who read GQ will want to see and drag
their men too.
Edited By: dawn9476
12/13/2008 10:58 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
funnyyale26 |
|||
|
Posts: 1290 (12/13/2008 10:57 PM) |
Looks like a f*** slut, she should have posed to playboy for the money. Seems desperate, IMO.
|
||
|
PinkSugar99 |
|||
|
Posts: 5263 (12/13/2008 11:16 PM) |
She looks freakin awesome!
|
||
|
sugarshaker |
|||
|
Posts: 232 (12/13/2008 11:18 PM) |
dawn9476 wrote: Now they have been reduced to posting blogspot blogs by Nobodies! It's probably the personal blogs of the resident Brangieloonies here.
Loonies, wake me when Aniston get crucified by oh say......THE NEW YORK TIMES! Like somebody else did recently....who was that again? 
|
||
|
herculean |
|||
|
Posts: 171 (12/13/2008 11:39 PM) |
sugarsugar wake up and read about how THE NEW YORK TIMES got EGG on their face.
N.Y. Times investigates itself Paper pulls back curtain on its celeb coverage By MIKE FLAHERTY With a plummeting stock price, dividend cuts, and last week's decision to mortgage its glimmering midtown headquarters, the New York Times is getting used to bad news. But getting egg on your face for sloppy reporting in a page-one story? About a couple of celebrities? Criticized by one of your own editors? That's gotta hurt. The brouhaha began Nov. 21, when the Times ran a story by reporter Brooks Barnes headlined "Angelina Jolie's Carefully Orchestrated Image," which implied that the "Changeling" star and partner Brad Pitt had negotiated a contract with People magazine that not only netted the couple $14 million for photos of their newborn twins but also included an "editorial plan" ensuring positive coverage for them in future People stories. Fast-forward to the Times of Dec. 7, which found the Gray Lady's public editor Clark Hoyt eviscerating the piece. After consulting with official sources -among them People managing editor Larry Hackett and the contract itself, neither of which Barnes got access to - Hoyt heard abject denials of the piece's claims and found no reference in the pact to any kind of editorial sweetheart deal. Barnes, it turns out, relied on an unnamed third party for his "scoop." Then Hoyt put the hammer down: "I think that unless one of (Barnes') sources is willing to come forward - on the record - and state firsthand knowledge (of the allegations), the paper needs to correct the impression of a deal it cannot prove." Barnes' continued defense of the piece, said Hoyt, "leaves the Times relying on anonymous sources to dispute on-the-record sources, a questionable position over a story of less than world-shaking import." Translation: It's one thing for Judith Miller to have bought the Bush administration's claims about Iraq's WMDs back in 2003, but punked by Brangelina? Come on. from variety.com
Edited By: herculean
12/13/2008 11:42 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
kenyaluv |
|||
|
Posts: 2376 (12/13/2008 11:55 PM) |
|||
|
kenyaluv |
|||
|
Posts: 2377 (12/13/2008 11:57 PM) |
moussemaker wrote: 
|
||
|
carlieed |
|||
|
Posts: 241 (12/14/2008 4:50 AM) |
Even with airbrushing she has such a freaking fugly face. And please, that body is has had so much surgery and airbrushing.
|
||
|
kikibunny |
|||
|
Posts: 300 (12/14/2008 7:13 AM) |
 
|
||
|
jen and ross forever |
|||
|
Posts: 16 (12/14/2008 8:11 AM) |
Bonnie Fuller
Posted December 12, 2008 | 07:07 PM (EST) Naked Jen's Delicious Revenge on Brangelina! Looking hot is the best revenge! That's clearly the strategy that Jen Aniston has finally settled on after watching Angelina bewitch her ex-husband Brad...and the rest of the world. And thank the Lord, Jen. Going into battle unabashedly nude with a body toned to perfection, is a far superior strategy against Brangelina than the endless whining that has been your hallmark style since your post-marital split. Now everyone knows that Jen's body truly is a wonderland. 2008-12-13-JAN1.jpg Playing the "poor, sad Jen" role would never make Brad eat his heart out. And we all know, Jen, that making Brad second guess his decision to leave you has been your goal all along. Every woman who's ever been dumped understands this. No matter how much time passes or how fabulous your new boyfriend, you always want your ex to yearn to have you back... and your ex's new love interest to feel sick about it. What better way to achieve this than to have the entire male global population drooling? Everyone, even in Brangelina-land, would notice that. It's the only offense that Jen could take. She can't compete against Angie's glamorous earth mother routine, which has so effectively hypnotized Brad. After all he's talked more than once about wanting to have nine kids - " we're looking for a soccer team," he has said. That left Jen with unabashed sexuality as the only way to go. 2008-12-13-JAN5.jpg "Her old look was victim. She looked like a sad puppy dog. Now she's powerful - she's realized that she's a sexy goddess," says Match.com relationship expert Whitney Casey, the author of the new book, The Man Plan: Drive Men Wild...Not Away! It's also Jen's reputation game changer. She has needed to irrevocably change the public perception about her, as a spurned wife. "This says, 'I'm a beautiful, sexy woman, hear me roar... now go see my new movie,'" points out psychotherapist, Dr. Jenn Berman. Nudity has also been a career-enhancer for Jen in the past. It was a Rolling Stone cover showing her lying on a bed, with a bare exposed tush, that first set her up as the "friend' to watch on the show that introduced her to the world. Later, post the Brad divorce, she had a memorable scene in the $100 million film, "The Break Up," in which she strolled naked past her co-star Vince Vaughn, as he regretted their split in the movie. The price of all this gorgeousness has not been cheap. Jen's monthly regimen to tone and tighten her body with private instruction from top LA yoga guru, Mandy Ingber, and other personal trainers, costs over $3,000 a month, according to the National Enquirer, and I believe them. She apparently has a private chef, preparing only high-protein, low-fat organic meals for $3,500 a month. She reportedly had a nose job, courtesy of Beverly Hills plastic surgeon Dr. Raj Kanodia, for about $12,000. She has anti-cellulite spa sculpting treatments for $1,000 a session, twice a month, and regular spray tanning sessions, which cost about $90 a pop. Yes, that may add up to an investment of well over $400,000 in the four years since Brad and Ange first met on the set of Mr. and Mrs. Smith. But, the value of knowing that Brad's jaw dropped when he saw her nude GQ cover: PRICELESS! |
||
|
Winter11 |
|||
|
Posts: 632 (12/14/2008 10:17 AM) |
^I doubt Brad's jaw dropped, he saw her ugly mug every morning..Men prefer a pretty face you know..
That article pretty much confirms how self-obsessed she is...which makes a person dull. She is still, more than ever, POOR JEN. |
||
|
BeeMaja |
|||
|
Posts: 698 (12/14/2008 10:22 AM) |
Brad and Angie is so happy with their 6 beautiful kids and 2 dogs,doesnt care past,doesnt care tabloids ,doesnt care what Jen talks in mags at all... They dont
care anything except their kids..Who cares if Jen still obssesed with her ex and blame Angie..she coudnt get over it.. Hope she will one day..
|
||
|
verygood.beautiful962 |
|||
|
Posts: 433 (12/14/2008 10:56 AM) |
Well her movies usually flop so now she's getting naked to keep people's interest.
|
||
|
carlieed |
|||
|
Posts: 265 (12/14/2008 11:32 AM) |
Actually, the best revenge would be to move on, and not mention Brad and Angie. She has a pathetic pattern. A movie is coming out, so she has to take
her clothes off for a mag, go out with a high profile male, and talk abut Brad and Angie.
|
||
http://disgrasian.blogspo...8%3A00&max-results=12
Dear Jennifer Aniston,
If I read another boo-hoo out of you ("Vogue, I can't buh-lieve what uncool Angelina said in another magazine!" "EW, I can't buh-lieve Vogue printed what I said about Angelina! It's not like everybody's slobbering in wait for me to breathe the word Ang-" "I'm the victim here!") I promise that I will send each one of my overbearing, stubborn, outspoken aunts out to your house to hunt you down and give you a good old-fashioned Hardass Asian talking to.
Y'know. Like the kind you get when you're getting divorced and they explain to you that you've suddenly made it everyone's dishonor problem.
Y'know. Like when they tell you that your career goals of becoming an engineer are stupid and worthless, and that if you loved anybody but yourself, you would just go to medical school like your mother wanted you to.
Y'know. Like when they say that you should exercise more. Because you look fat.
They're mean as hell. But they're honest.
Trust me, at the end, you won't feel pretty, you won't feel cool, you won't feel good about the fact that you're still dating that cooz John Mayer-but you will understand (hopefully) that there's no pride in airing your relationship dirty laundry through PR channels over the course of five years. That in order to maintain your dignity you've can't cry out loud-just keep it inside, and hold your head up high, and make a goddamn good movie for Chrissake.
Please. Have a little pride.
xoxo
D