| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 johntp75 |
Christina Aguilera got naked and showed her nipples for a... |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 46 (08/07/2008 10:58 PM) |
See the Image here -
SFW but there is a link if you are curious about the big buzz
She was 27, took the picture with other LaChapelle regulars including Pamela Anderson - Pamela was wearing clothes....christina none |
||
|
Celebrity724 |
|||
|
Posts: 32716 (08/07/2008 11:23 PM) |
strange shoot... not sure why she felt the need to be the only one naked.
|
||
|
J6July |
|||
|
Posts: 5108 (08/07/2008 11:32 PM) |
I love David LaChapelle's shoots.
|
||
|
inthepink715 |
|||
|
Posts: 16918 (08/08/2008 8:23 PM) |
I don't see nipples even in the uncut one
|
||
|
NoDoUbTroX |
|||
|
Posts: 1079 (08/08/2008 8:30 PM) |
umm...how do you not see nipple?
I love LaChapelle! |
||
|
Lalme |
|||
|
Posts: 130 (08/08/2008 8:31 PM) |
LOL. That's from 2004.
|
||
|
hvnlyinnocent01 |
|||
|
Posts: 1864 (08/08/2008 8:35 PM) |
Well I mean she's always said she felt comfortable being naked and she's posed more naked than that before, but they've all been tastefully done,
impo. I think that is a classy photo of her, not all spread out and vulgar.
|
||
|
insomniachollie |
|||
|
Posts: 35018 (08/08/2008 8:37 PM) Best Fan Fic Writer '08 |
She's posed naked before, can;t say it's a shocker.
|
||
|
moussemaker |
|||
|
Posts: 13283 (08/08/2008 8:38 PM) |
I think that is a classy photo of her, not all spread out and vulgar. 
|
||
|
hvnlyinnocent01 |
|||
|
Posts: 1865 (08/08/2008 8:43 PM) |
^ LOL yeah it's not like that.
|
||
|
dancer4j |
|||
|
Posts: 1004 (08/08/2008 8:49 PM) |
NoDoUbTroX wrote: i don't see it either, too much shadow. |
||
|
alidakat |
|||
|
Posts: 25 (08/08/2008 9:59 PM) |
|
||
|
Yes1990 |
|||
|
Posts: 6230 (08/09/2008 12:17 PM) |
|
||
|
jtsbodyrocker |
|||
|
Posts: 33630 (08/09/2008 12:29 PM) |
i believe those are all separate shots meshed together so i dont think she was posing naked in a room full of people. but i think its a cute shot.
|
||
|
Racheltp1324 |
|||
|
Posts: 7484 (08/09/2008 12:34 PM) |
Why does it say when she was 27 as if it was a long time ago? Isn't she 27 now? She looks super young in this, at least a few years old.
|
||
|
YouSuckAndThatsSad |
|||
|
Posts: 848 (08/09/2008 12:49 PM) |
Celebrity724 wrote: because she's an attention whore. |
||
|
Batoutofheck |
|||
|
Posts: 6328 (08/09/2008 12:56 PM) |
Yep, this is a few years old.
|
||
|
jain smith |
|||
|
Posts: 3532 (08/10/2008 1:12 PM) |
moussemaker wrote: Ewwww...Dirrrty!!!!! |
||
