^thanks
Miley Cyrus topless on Vanity Fair
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 princessarti |
|||
|
Posts: 3405 (04/26/2008 10:46 PM) |
|
||
|
sexischerzo06 |
|||
|
Posts: 2911 (04/26/2008 10:46 PM) |
lovely4ever wrote: she looks topless to me too...btw, didn't you have another sn?
|
||
|
eX kAhN |
|||
|
Posts: 1115 (04/26/2008 10:46 PM) |
this is stupid. i didnt see shit on E. they aire the same crap over and over and... nothing.
|
||
|
princessarti |
|||
|
Posts: 3406 (04/26/2008 10:46 PM) |
well watch the ET clip
|
||
|
Mistress Darcy |
|||
|
Posts: 185 (04/26/2008 10:46 PM) |
I will bet anyone she has some sort of backless or low back shirt and she just appears topless. Perfect way to get controversy-she is not REALLY doing anything
wrong, but the effect is still there.
Does she really have a cd due this July??? |
||
|
princessarti |
|||
|
Posts: 3407 (04/26/2008 10:47 PM) |
yeah but still she should try to look sexy.
|
||
|
beckhamboys |
|||
|
Posts: 7521 (04/26/2008 10:48 PM) |
WOW that's just wrong and her dad was obviously at the shoot can' believe he allowed this
|
||
|
eX kAhN |
|||
|
Posts: 1116 (04/26/2008 10:48 PM) |
but it's illegal in the US... there is no way in hell it's happening i dont give a shit what you thought you saw. it was probably a tube top or
something.
retarded as hell use your brain. |
||
|
lovely4ever |
|||
|
Posts: 2 (04/26/2008 10:49 PM) |
sexischerzo06 wrote: yeah i did but i forgot the password so i changed it and they gave me an old sn that i don't even remember making lmao im not sure what happened there
|
||
 dannie9 |
|||
|
Posts: 1679 (04/26/2008 10:50 PM) |
things that are considered art arent illegal in the us tho. no matter what age.
|
||
|
eX kAhN |
|||
|
Posts: 1117 (04/26/2008 10:50 PM) |
i guess it could happen if it's just a bare back shot. but still, that's pathetic of her father if it's the case and yea, welcome to
mediawhoreville...
adda way to promote child sexual abuse |
||
|
All That Jaz |
|||
|
Posts: 52101 (04/26/2008 10:52 PM) |
Yea, was she like FOR SURE naked?
I mean I searched, Yahoo, Google News, E!online and I got NOTHING about this story. I mean, I would think it would be huge. Are we sure it wasn't her in a low tube top and the media hyping things up? These news shows always have some huge line "You won't BELIEVE what so and so did next!" And then you see the clip and it's totally nothing lol I'm not saying it not true, it just seems weird, and I found no new or clips about it anywhere. And this is not good press for her Disney show, true or exgerrated they need to talk some sense into, She's only been around like a year and she's already getting into shady situations. I don't know if she's gonna last much longer at this rate lol
Edited By: All That Jaz
04/26/2008 10:56 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
JamieLoverGurl42 |
|||
|
Posts: 8705 (04/26/2008 10:52 PM) Most Dramatic JJBer '09
|
She looks shirtless
|
||
|
oohykitten |
|||
|
Posts: 13063 (04/26/2008 10:54 PM) |
Its Britney is Rolling Stone all over again...she has to have SOMETHING on, but that doesn't mean they aren't out to make her look topless. In soaps
they have stuff covering body parts, but it still looks like they are naked having sex now doesn't it?
|
||
|
eX kAhN |
|||
|
Posts: 1118 (04/26/2008 10:58 PM) |
this thread is lame. the people who start this shit are lame. You see 2 seconds of something and then assume a whole mess of shit.
stupid i'll eat my words when and if it ever really happens which i bet your ass it wont. http://www.news.com/Federal-case-may-redefine-child-porn/2100-1030_3-6139524.html like vanity fair wants to be in that guys shoes and that guy just posed them in an adult way.
Edited By: eX kAhN
04/26/2008 11:04 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
Celebrity724 |
|||
|
Posts: 31790 (04/26/2008 11:01 PM) |
SERIOUSLY!
if you pause it, you can see the strings from the HALTER TOP she is wearing. |
||
|
eX kAhN |
|||
|
Posts: 1120 (04/26/2008 11:23 PM) |
ew, how pathetic and desperate.
epic fail. all the teen boys and pedophiles will have boners and her career will tank.. nice one. |
||
|
divaTy |
|||
|
Posts: 11857 (04/26/2008 11:27 PM) |
I don't think ET would say it's topless if it's not. Sweeps or not.
|
||
|
neoaddicted |
|||
|
Posts: 167 (04/26/2008 11:29 PM) |
Lol, even better is the ~sultry~ look she's giving daddy at the end of the clip. Oh Billy Ray, even Joe Simpson would say there's a limit to pimping
out your own child.
|
||
|
AshJs3 |
|||
|
Posts: 58331 (04/26/2008 11:32 PM) |
LMFAO! WTF? 900 pages and there aren't even pictures?
I bet it's just something dumb that shows her back. I HIGHLY doubt she's on the cover, arms in the air, jiggling or something like that. 
|
||
