TiggerlovesCM wrote:
No its not. They are both "art forms". I am not saying that what he was looking at IS child porn because I haven't seen what the characters look like. But if it is child porn, no REAL children were hurt and it is therefore fantasy
I understand the spirit of protecting art and it's freedoms, but on the other hand, you'd have to be sick in the head to be into that kind of thing, and pedophiles are rarely "fixed" by therapy. Pedophiles also tend to escalate, and I think by condoning his possession of that stuff, it's like saying on some level "this kind of behavior is acceptable" to other pedophiles. I'm not sure if I'm making sense though, so ignore me if I'm not.