dear lady wrote:
I don't really like people who assume the animals used to make that were cruelly killed. We have no idea, but I'm assuming that most high-end designers, because of technology and such, use pretty humane methods when killing the animals for fur. Now I'm not really for or against fur because I think fur is great and definitely serves its purpose, but I'm not a fan of huge fur coats or anything like that because it just seems like a waste of animal to me, and on top of that I don't like the way it looks. So I'm stuck in the middle and I'm just sharing the first thought that comes to my mind when I read that title.

Also, I'd like to see Snoop Dogg criticized for his fur collection. I hear he has a huge one.

Since we don't know, why assume they were killed humanely? Are designers known for their high moral values? They might be talented designers, but their status has nothing to do with their ethics when it comes to murdering animals for their "fashion." Fortunately there are designers like Stella McCartney who consider morality into her designs.

I could post pictures of the animals clubbed or caught alive in fur traps, but I think we all know this is going on. Let's not pretend it's better than it is.