cocoacritic wrote:
floacism wrote:
cheddarcheese2 wrote:
I agree that the kids should not be chased and stalked by the paparazzi because they didn't have a choice in being famour or not. But I almost kind of want to roll my eyes because we have bigger issues to worry about than rich peoples kids being photographed laugh.gif If that makes sense.
So because they're rich, the protection of their kids doesn't matter? smiley: laugh

Perhaps the parents shouldn't court the attention in the first place.

Mel Gibson has what, 20 kids? When the sugar-tits incident went down and the affairs became public and the abusive shouting matches flooded the net, how was he able to protect his children?

We saw his baby girl with Oksana because she was using the child to get attention during the court battle. Now all we see is one photo here and there.

Same thing goes for Schwarzenegger, where are the daily photos of his son Joseph since the scandal?

Most of the garbage Halle is getting is because of her actions. She tried to manipulate the media using the paparazzi and now shit has backfired.  Affleck has NO problem with daily photos of his kids when he has a Best Picture on the line.


gosh a child is a child,so not protecting  them when they are obviously being hunt down,harass etc because they have famous parents it s just plain inhumane
your line of thought it s just  Disapprovekw2

p.s we all know JEN GARNER and halle call the paps and probably Cruise etc
but you also can see pictures/videos of paps making Suri cry and calling her LITTLE BITCH.

Edited By: samantha m 09/26/2013 3:27 PM. Edited 2 times.