JayneOC wrote:
joey is a teapot wrote:
JayneOC wrote:
People are so pressed to paint Zimmerman as some evil man that common sense is thrown out the window. Just because Zimmerman got out of the car doesn't mean he killed Trayvon in cold blood. It doesn't mean he attacked first (the act of getting out of a car and questioning Trayvon is NOT an attack). It doesnt mean he didnt shoot because he was in fear for his life. Should he be charged with a crime? Depends on your point of view but no way should he have been charged with more than manslaughter. The higher charge is a mistake and will set Zimmerman free.

You need to get George Zimmerman's dick out of your mouth and come back into the real world, ma'am.
Oh please. Just because I didn't jump on the "George Zimmerman is an evil man who murdered Trayvon Martin in cold blood" bandwagon doesn't mean I have his dick in my mouth. Thanks for the visual by the way (yuck). Weirdly, I like to wait for evidence before I find someone guilty of a crime like murder. Weird concept in the world of the media instantly finding someone guilty.

I think that what happened was manslaughter at the most. George Zimmerman didn't get out of his car with the intent of killing anyone and no amount of people screaming how he's an evil murderer will change my opinion on that (unless there's some great unknown evidence out there that we hear later).  The prosecutor's over-reaching to satisfy people screaming for the blood of Zimmerman (like so many here at the jjb) is going to get him off.  No jury with a brain will find him guilty of murder.

You're contradicting yourself. You say you like to wait for evidence before passing judgment yet pass judgment on the prosecutor's decision saying she's over-reaching when you don't have knowledge or access to all the evidence she has.