ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 14777
05/31/2011 1:13 PM
yankeefanNcali wrote:The written ruling states: 'Vasquez argues she has and is suffering harm in that she has had difficulty in obtaining work as a result of Lopez's attempts at enforcing the injunction against her.''Vasquez argues that Lopez, on the other hand, will suffer no harm if Vazquez's preliminary injunction is granted. 'Lopez puts forth no arguments contradicting those of Vazquez and, in fact, fails to address this element of the preliminary injunction test altogether. 'As a result, the Court finds that the balance of the equities weighs in favour of Vazquez.'
'Vasquez argues that Lopez, on the other hand, will suffer no harm if Vazquez's preliminary injunction is granted.
'Lopez puts forth no arguments contradicting those of Vazquez and, in fact, fails to address this element of the preliminary injunction test altogether.
'As a result, the Court finds that the balance of the equities weighs in favour of Vazquez.'
Share This Link