ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 25568
02/14/2010 5:49 PM
Chris Fanatic '03
Posts: 42963
02/14/2010 5:56 PM
Posts: 67935
02/14/2010 5:59 PM
Best Debater '09 Likes to Bully Self '11Miss Government Assistance '11Does Ok Things '12A. Mediocre. Star. '12
TiggerlovesCM wrote: But can any of you PROOVE that they are actual children?
02/14/2010 6:04 PM
Posts: 116270
02/14/2010 6:05 PM
Posts: 30120
02/14/2010 6:09 PM
Bite meMama's A Bad Bitch
TYCP Sha wrote: No one is going to agree on one thing. Half are saying it's lolicon & the other is saying it's not. Give it up.
02/14/2010 6:10 PM
The 40-year-old was charged under the 2003 Protect Act, which outlaws cartoons, drawings, sculptures or paintings depicting minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct, and which lack “serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.”
02/14/2010 6:12 PM
Posts: 10386
02/14/2010 6:15 PM
chocolate covered raisins wrote:It's wrong because it's about CHILDREN. Talk about the 1st amendment all you want it is wrong to find raping children entertaining.
02/14/2010 6:18 PM
Posts: 10284
02/14/2010 6:20 PM
Yeah Christianne wrote:chocolate covered raisins wrote:It's wrong because it's about CHILDREN. Talk about the 1st amendment all you want it is wrong to find raping children entertaining. It doesn't matter if it's about CHILDREN. It is wrong to find murdering people entertaining, yet it is completely legal to play video games that depict exactly that. EXPLAIN WHY ONE IS OKAY AND THE OTHER ISN'T.
02/14/2010 6:21 PM
Posts: 45348
02/14/2010 6:22 PM
Best Male JJBer '07 Best Debater '08 Current Events Scoop '09 JJB Bully '11
02/14/2010 6:23 PM
02/14/2010 6:25 PM
02/14/2010 6:27 PM
02/14/2010 6:28 PM
Share This Link