JeterFan wrote:You said that with a whole less B words then I would use. Notice how she's talking after the will was made public and she found out that those kids were left a bulk of his estate/ WTF where she at all these years, then its barely been a week now she'll pulling this shit. Its clear she's in it for the money/ Pushing a couple kids out does not make you a parent. Michael was the true parent to those kids, and now she's going to take them away from the only family they've ever known? It was Michael's wishes that they stay with his mother. Yes she's older but the Jackson family is huge, I'm sure all his siblings will take care of those kids. If she wanted to be in those kids lives, she would have made more of an effort oh when Michael was alive, bitch.
As soon as I heard she had been shut out of the will I knew that bitch would pull a dirty trick. She's just trying to get a payout to drop the custody case, that's all. Bitch doesn't even know those kids. She sold them, plain and simple. And then split them up, too? My God, what a horrible woman. Giving birth does not automatically make you a mother in the true sense of the word.
Greedy bitch.![]()
Debbie Rowe does want custody of Prince & Paris
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Jadia55 |
|||
|
Posts: 1392 (07/03/2009 3:47 AM) |
Edited By: Jadia55
07/03/2009 3:49 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
NotLiza |
|||
|
Posts: 667 (07/03/2009 7:09 AM) |
I'm not sure what to think about her. We really don't know anything about her at all. Who knows, maybe she'd be a great guardian, maybe she'd
suck.
What bothers me is that MJ wanted Katherine to care of the kids, and that the kids obviously know Katherine better than Debbie. So Debbie really doesn't seem like the best option at all; regardless of her parental skills and personality. Plus, she adds an extra issue to the situation, because what happens to the smallest child then? |
||
xomadi89 |
|||
|
Posts: 2067 (07/03/2009 7:51 AM) |
Moon and Star wrote: I think what everyone's upset about is that NOW she decides she cares about them and wants custody. Now? She never gave a shit before
and she thinks she'll just jump in and take them? That's like you adopting a kid at birth and 10 years down the road the "bio mom" thinks she
knows your kid/wants your kid. All she did was give birth to it. Michael's family are the people these kids grew up around, their cousins, aunts, uncles,
etc. If they went with Debbie, they would literally but living with a stranger. How terrible would that be for them?
|
||
hiphopsdevilchild |
|||
|
Posts: 4027 (07/03/2009 7:55 AM) |
I really hope that she doesn't get custody. From her previous interviews it doesn't appear that these children know her at all and will at some point
find out that she basically sold them to Michael and gave multiple interviews saying she didn't want them.
I don't know, maybe she is sincere, I doubt it but if she is and she does get custdy of the 2 she probably wouldn't get custody of the 3rd so I think for the children's sake it'd be better if they all lived together in the Jackson household (where Joe clearly does not live) and she should get visitation or joint custody and a chance to build a relationship with them (if she genuinely wants one that is). Although it doesn't appear that she had any interest in them at all. That comment about him not holding up his side or whatever sounds to me like he promised her more money in his will or something rather than him promising her custody in the event of his death. I'm sure she would have said that if it was anything like that. She just seems really shady and insincere. Someone said that Katherine lives with some of her children and their families right? So she would hardly be an 80 year old raising them alone and in the event of her death I'd guess if that Diana as back up part came into play, as someone quite old herself and obviously a close family friend, she'd probably leave them with his siblings and their families who they seem to know as their actual family and have grown up around so I don't think Michael wanting Katherine to be their guardian is a negative thing. Especially as Joe lives elsewhere. |
||
Capricorn1229 |
|||
|
Posts: 11856 (07/03/2009 8:23 AM) Most Likely To Respond with a Gif '09
|
Moon and Star wrote: |
||
Charrm |
|||
|
Posts: 10559 (07/03/2009 8:34 AM) |
magnoliam wrote:she has already given testimony on what she'd expect to happen should he ever pass away. all of her testimonies and the court docs that she has already signed would no doubt come into play, if she ever gets as far as entering a courtroom. bitch must be smoking that good shit. |
||

I think what everyone's upset about is that NOW she decides she cares about them and wants custody. Now? She never gave a shit before
and she thinks she'll just jump in and take them? That's like you adopting a kid at birth and 10 years down the road the "bio mom" thinks she
knows your kid/wants your kid. All she did was give birth to it. Michael's family are the people these kids grew up around, their cousins, aunts, uncles,
etc. If they went with Debbie, they would literally but living with a stranger. How terrible would that be for them?
