nycitygirl1118 wrote:that goes both ways, though. you can't be any more sure of what the kids are going through than anyone else on here. maybe they're not curious about her.
How do any of you know these kids don't know who she is - especially her own kids?? At their ages I'm sure they know they have a mother and are curious about her.
Debbie Rowe does want custody of Prince & Paris
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 franknbeans82 |
|||
|
Posts: 30958 (07/02/2009 5:07 PM) |
|
||
|
mackiaveli |
|||
|
Posts: 53 (07/02/2009 5:10 PM) |
Her children? What a crock! Its obvious that gold digger Debbie is only vowing to fight for custody of Paris and Prince because of money. Debbie knows that the
bulk of Michael's assets will be given to the kids in a trust. And this greedy woman wants to get some of the money as well. It's a damn shame this is
happening. I don't think those 3 children need to be separated especially after they have just unexpected lost their father last week. I think Katherine
Jackson and Diana Ross are the best options to care for the children and it will ensure that the children stay together like they have been all their lives. So
I hope this is what happens. Its going to get ugly. But I hope Debbie loses and crawls back into the hole she came out of.
|
||
|
dawn9476 |
|||
|
Posts: 22879 (07/02/2009 5:10 PM) |
Breaking News from AP via Yahoo:
|
||
|
oliverbandit |
|||
|
Posts: 7624 (07/02/2009 5:16 PM) |
Someone's gonna put a cap in her ass. Just watch.
|
||
|
nevaehdreamz |
|||
|
Posts: 1205 (07/02/2009 5:20 PM) |
I'm pretty sure something went wrong with Debbie. Michael was so fond of her before....even before they had kids together. For him to specifically state in
his will that he's purposely leaving her out...
|
||
|
dedaman03 |
|||
|
Posts: 6152 (07/02/2009 5:27 PM) |
nycitygirl1118 wrote:That is not remotely the same thing. When you go in to be a surrogate it is with full understanding that the children aren't yours and you get paid a hefty fee as this gutter bitch did. Twice to be exact. 
|
||
|
dedaman03 |
|||
|
Posts: 6153 (07/02/2009 5:29 PM) |
blairboy wrote:THANK YOU for clearing that shit up, I was getting tired of the repetitiveness. 
|
||
|
MeParley |
|||
|
Posts: 15001 (07/02/2009 5:30 PM) |
This is going to be such a circus. It's all about the money when someone leaves a large estate. |
||
|
nevaehdreamz |
|||
|
Posts: 1206 (07/02/2009 5:35 PM) |
dedaman03 wrote: That's not what happened. She was there in the beginning. She took care of them there are pictures of them together just being normal, she'd go on tour with him and all that jazz...and was active in their lives as babies. Eventually she asked for a divorce because she couldn't "handle" it anymore and she willingly went to the courts and surrendered all of her parental rights. It probably hurt him. |
||
|
JeterFan |
|||
|
Posts: 20950 (07/02/2009 5:36 PM) |
...as if it isn't already ( a circus). That woman is pure evil to put her children through more trauma just so she can get some money.
|
||
|
oohykitten |
|||
|
Posts: 14547 (07/02/2009 5:41 PM) |
Maybe JUST maybe he made it clear that Debbie was out so that Blankets mother couldn't come back and say that child and his money were meant to be
her's as well. He didn't say no to his father, or to Lisa Marie.
|
||
|
dedaman03 |
|||
|
Posts: 6155 (07/02/2009 5:41 PM) |
nevaehdreamz wrote: I know that they were married, but didn't she say she never wanted children and that her womb was a gift to Micheal? Then years later she came back to fight for money visitation and they settled? No mother who loves her children would willingly give them up, she never wanted them
and she's said as much on multiple occasions. In my eyes she was a surrogate and she more than likely knew that going in to the relationship/marriage ahead
of time.
|
||
|
xomadi89 |
|||
|
Posts: 2061 (07/02/2009 5:42 PM) |
I fucking hate this woman. She's nothing more than an egg donor. If Michael wasn't dead she wouldn't even give a shit about them. I sincerely hope
those kids do not end up with her, for their sanity. Any court that rules HER getting these children is insane. She NEVER wanted them. Go DIE in a FIRE Debbie
Rowe.
|
||
|
SusieMC |
|||
|
Posts: 642 (07/02/2009 5:44 PM) |
The legal analysts on CNN are saying that Debbie is only getting into court to be heard. That is it. She has an uphill battle to fight after that. They
don't think her case is that strong.
That proof that Michael was a good father and the kids were always his #1 priority will weigh heavily in court. She will probably get visitation.....but they don't expect anything else. One of those commenting was the judge involved in the Anna Nicole Smith custody case with her daughter after she died. |
||
|
moussemaker |
|||
|
Posts: 18333 (07/02/2009 5:44 PM) |
 Maybe the kids would like to stay in contact with their mother? Even
if she was not part of their lives for years?
|
||
|
xomadi89 |
|||
|
Posts: 2063 (07/02/2009 5:45 PM) |
moussemaker wrote:Maybe, but do you give a shit about.... me? Do you care about being a part of my life? You know me as well as they know her. |
||
|
dedaman03 |
|||
|
Posts: 6156 (07/02/2009 5:47 PM) |
moussemaker wrote:Yes, I can't wait until she explains all her public interviews about how she didn't want them. She'll probably twist it to make MJ look like the bad guy since he isn't alive to defend himself. I'm sorry but her sincerity just isn't believable to me. |
||
|
Craving Justin |
|||
|
Posts: 5802 (07/02/2009 5:49 PM) |
xomadi89 wrote: Great post. |
||
|
moussemaker |
|||
|
Posts: 18336 (07/02/2009 5:50 PM) |
But the kids still their whole life ahead of them to build a connection to their mother.
Some folks meet their fathers later in life, too, and still manage to have a good relationship with them. |
||
|
dedaman03 |
|||
|
Posts: 6157 (07/02/2009 5:52 PM) |
moussemaker wrote:True, but I've been down that road and...yeah, not so much.
|
||
Quick Reply
