Debbie Rowe does want custody of Prince & Paris

RSS
Email

0 Kudo

Started By	Comment
JustMusic101		#41	[-]
Posts: 14959 (07/02/2009 2:38 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	WHAT?! This bitch is gonna have it coming! Didn't Michael have to shell money out to her twice? Once after she had the two, then a few years later? I remember her kicking up some shit before.
chocolatemama88		#42	[-]
Posts: 9732 (07/02/2009 2:38 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	She probably is right about Joe. And that's a damn shame.
Ease Your Mind		#43	[-]
Posts: 2097 (07/02/2009 2:39 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	I wouldn't want to go with a woman I didn't know. And you're not the only one who agrees w/ her concern over Mr. Jackson. Most of us have voiced our disdain for him. I also agree with her about not split up the kids. But that doesn't mean she should get custody of them. Edited By: Ease Your Mind 07/02/2009 2:43 PM. Edited 1 times.
JellyRoll2		#44	[-]
Posts: 16424 (07/02/2009 2:39 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	No, I agree with her concern over Joe. But Michael didn't leave his kids with Joe. He left them with Katherine. The two don't even really live together anymore.
franknbeans82		#45	[-]
Posts: 30943 (07/02/2009 2:39 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	how nice of her to want to seperate them from their brother, right after they've lost their father. i'm sure this will bode well for the children.
nycitygirl1118		#46	[-]
Posts: 1099 (07/02/2009 2:44 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Worse people have gotten custody of their kids - drug users, child molesters and abusers. Why do people act surprised she'd want her kids? For all we know Michael could have been keeping her from kids and using his money to do it. It's not like he's the most normal person.
orangepeel19		#47	[-]
Posts: 12343 (07/02/2009 2:45 PM) Friendliest JJBer '09 Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	What a fucking loser. She kept saying she didn't want them and that her womb was a gift. Now she wants to separate the 3 after they lost their only parent?! HELL no.
blairboy		#48	[-]
Posts: 34088 (07/02/2009 2:46 PM) Best Male JJBer '07 Best Debater '08 Current Events Scoop '09 Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	nycitygirl1118 wrote: Worse people have gotten custody of their kids - drug users, child molesters and abusers. Why do people act surprised she'd want her kids? For all we know Michael could have been keeping her from kids and using his money to do it. It's not like he's the most normal person. Expect this isn't your normal custody battle (if it comes to that). ALL eyes will be on this. PLUS. this woman has given plenty of interviews where she said the kids were a gift to MJ and she doesn't want contact with him. But now does. Mmm. Sketchy.
babydtc23		#49	[-]
Posts: 7450 (07/02/2009 2:46 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Not sure if I believe this......yet.
Froggy86		#50	[-]
Posts: 10237 (07/02/2009 2:50 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	blairboy wrote: nycitygirl1118 wrote: Worse people have gotten custody of their kids - drug users, child molesters and abusers. Why do people act surprised she'd want her kids? For all we know Michael could have been keeping her from kids and using his money to do it. It's not like he's the most normal person. Expect this isn't your normal custody battle (if it comes to that). ALL eyes will be on this. PLUS. this woman has given plenty of interviews where she said the kids were a gift to MJ and she doesn't want contact with him. But now does. Mmm. Sketchy. EXACTLY. I don't think she will get custody, because they kids can state their preference and it's QUITE obvious why all of the sudden she wants them. Hello, she was left out of the will on purpose.
JaimJaim		#51	[-]
Posts: 24434 (07/02/2009 2:50 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Debbie Rowe will fight for custody of her two children with Michael Jackson, according to KNBC Los Angeles reporter Chuck Henry, who spoke to the pop star's ex-wife on Thursday morning. Henry, who said he had a "long conversation" with Rowe, confirmed the woman's plans to pursue custody of Prince Michael I, 12, and Paris Jackson, 11. "She told me, 'Yes I am stepping up… I have to.' She will try for custody of her children," Henry said. "And she was still very much grieving this morning and has been, she says, for the last week over the death of Michael Jackson." Additionally, Rowe told Henry that she plans to take action to keep Joe Jackson away from his grandchildren. "She also said she would seek some kind of restraining order if that was necessary to keep Joe Jackson, Michael Jackson's father, away from the children," Henry recounted. Rowe said the reason she planned to step forward now is because the pop star didn't "keep his end of the bargain," referring to the singer dying. "When he died, that's when she decided to do something. She told me, 'They are my flesh and blood. I'm going after my children,'" Henry recounted. Henry said Rowe had an agreement with her ex-husband that "did allow for visitation," but Henry said it was "very difficult for her to do." Rowe told Henry if she missed a visitation date due to illness or similar reason, "it would be hard to get a makeup date, so it was very difficult to visit the children," he recounted. Rowe also told the reporter she would be willing to take care of Jackson's third child so as not to split up the youngsters. "She was very much concerned about [not splitting up the kids]," Henry added. "I pointedly asked her about that and she said she would take the child we know as Blanket, Prince Michael II, but she didn't have any illusions that the court would award her the third child. But she said she would." As previously reported on AccessHollywood.com, the pop star left Rowe out of his will. Jackson left all assets to the Michael Jackson Family Trust. According to documents submitted with the will, Rowe was not a member of the Michael Jackson Family Trust. http://www.accesshollywood.com/_article_20082
yankeefanNcali		#52	[-]
Posts: 3616 (07/02/2009 2:54 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Debbie sees $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Kisses4NSync		#53	[-]
Posts: 12210 (07/02/2009 2:56 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	oohykitten wrote: Oh well I guess I am the only one that agrees with her concern over Joe Jackson. No you're not. I am too. If Katherine gets the kids, that means they will be around Joe Jackson too and I would really feel for those poor kids if that happens.
blairboy		#54	[-]
Posts: 34091 (07/02/2009 2:58 PM) Best Male JJBer '07 Best Debater '08 Current Events Scoop '09 Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Kisses4NSync wrote: oohykitten wrote: Oh well I guess I am the only one that agrees with her concern over Joe Jackson. No you're not. I am too. If Katherine gets the kids, that means they will be around Joe Jackson too and I would really feel for those poor kids if that happens. No they won't. KATHERINE & JOE do not LIVE together. And haven't. The only time those could would probably see him is during family shit.
yankeefanNcali		#55	[-]
Posts: 3617 (07/02/2009 2:58 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Kisses4NSync wrote: oohykitten wrote: Oh well I guess I am the only one that agrees with her concern over Joe Jackson. No you're not. I am too. If Katherine gets the kids, that means they will be around Joe Jackson too and I would really feel for those poor kids if that happens. yes but I thought Joe lived in Las Vegas and katherine still stayed in the house in Encino along with Jermaine, his wife kids, Randy, Jackie ...if I'm not mistaken they all lived in that house with their wives and kids. Joe hasn't lived there in years. He lives in Las Vegas. From how Katherine handled Joe in that interview I would say things are different and she's older and so Michael's other sibblings. I don't think Joe has that much control over any of them as he once did.
JeterFan		#56	[-]
Posts: 20939 (07/02/2009 3:01 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	As soon as I heard she had been shut out of the will I knew that bitch would pull a dirty trick. She's just trying to get a payout to drop the custody case, that's all. Bitch doesn't even know those kids. She sold them, plain and simple. And then split them up, too? My God, what a horrible woman. Giving birth does not automatically make you a mother in the true sense of the word. Greedy bitch.
Kisses4NSync		#57	[-]
Posts: 12211 (07/02/2009 3:04 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	Yeah maybe you're right, yankee..and I don't think Joe Jackson should see the kids ever..not even during family get-togethers.
Froggy86		#58	[-]
Posts: 10238 (07/02/2009 3:05 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	JellyRoll2 wrote: No, I agree with her concern over Joe. But Michael didn't leave his kids with Joe. He left them with Katherine. The two don't even really live together anymore. Exactly, they don't. Those children were Michael's, for her to be all of the sudden concerned is ridiculous. She just wanted to stir the pot every few years and suck more money out of him. He loved those kids, they should be with his family.
Nancy White		#59	[-]
Posts: 2628 (07/02/2009 3:06 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	God, poor kids...
franknbeans82		#60	[-]
Posts: 30945 (07/02/2009 3:06 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Friend Block Invite Ignore	JaimJaim wrote: Debbie Rowe will fight for custody of her two children with Michael Jackson, according to KNBC Los Angeles reporter Chuck Henry, who spoke to the pop star's ex-wife on Thursday morning. Henry, who said he had a "long conversation" with Rowe, confirmed the woman's plans to pursue custody of Prince Michael I, 12, and Paris Jackson, 11. "She told me, 'Yes I am stepping up… I have to.' She will try for custody of her children," Henry said. "And she was still very much grieving this morning and has been, she says, for the last week over the death of Michael Jackson." Additionally, Rowe told Henry that she plans to take action to keep Joe Jackson away from his grandchildren. "She also said she would seek some kind of restraining order if that was necessary to keep Joe Jackson, Michael Jackson's father, away from the children," Henry recounted. Rowe said the reason she planned to step forward now is because the pop star didn't "keep his end of the bargain," referring to the singer dying. "When he died, that's when she decided to do something. She told me, 'They are my flesh and blood. I'm going after my children,'" Henry recounted. Henry said Rowe had an agreement with her ex-husband that "did allow for visitation," but Henry said it was "very difficult for her to do." Rowe told Henry if she missed a visitation date due to illness or similar reason, "it would be hard to get a makeup date, so it was very difficult to visit the children," he recounted. Rowe also told the reporter she would be willing to take care of Jackson's third child so as not to split up the youngsters. "She was very much concerned about [not splitting up the kids]," Henry added. "I pointedly asked her about that and she said she would take the child we know as Blanket, Prince Michael II, but she didn't have any illusions that the court would award her the third child. But she said she would." As previously reported on AccessHollywood.com, the pop star left Rowe out of his will. Jackson left all assets to the Michael Jackson Family Trust. According to documents submitted with the will, Rowe was not a member of the Michael Jackson Family Trust. http://www.accesshollywood.com/_article_20082 i really hope she will not be awarded custody. all this time it has seemed to me that she didn't care to be a part of their lives, and now suddenly she's claiming it was b/c she couldn't get make-up visitation days, lol? more like she didn't get included in the will, so these kids would be her meal ticket. i do not think this is in the best interest of the kids. i imagine they barely know her, and there's a chance it would split them up.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Yuku free message boards

Debbie Rowe does want custody of Prince & Paris

Quick Reply