Isnt she also mom that DIDNT get her rights taken because she wasnt an "unfit parent"? Also from the pictures of Michaels father from today...I am
not willing to hand him three fragle kids on the bases that he has changed. Those kids have $$$ on their heads in the eyes of too many. janet is honestly the
only one that doesnt need Michaels money.
This talk about MJ's kids...
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 oohykitten |
|||
|
Posts: 14512 (06/27/2009 2:01 AM) |
|
||
|
Samantha James |
|||
|
Posts: 14319 (06/27/2009 2:04 AM) |
Mistress Darcy wrote:I don't know the whole deal with the moms. That's why I said that I don't know much about the kids' moms but unless they're unstable and unfit, the kids should go to their moms. I knew Debbie (?) signed over her rights at one point but I'm not aware of whether she tried to see them or was involved with them at all. And what's the story with the other mom? |
||
|
blairboy |
|||
|
Posts: 33943 (06/27/2009 2:05 AM)
|
I HIGHLY doubt that Jackson's father COULD even beat the shit out of fly with how sick he's been. I don't see the point in flipping out on him or
the family because of the past. I HIGHLY doubt it can be repeated.
ALL those kids know is that family, their bio "mom" has had NO contact with the kids other than what she sees in the news. She didn't want contact. Her words. I don't think the kids belong with her. You have to look at what's good for the kids, splitting them up IS NOT a good idea, all they have right now is each other. They just lost their Dad, weird as he may have been you can tell he LOVED those kids. And did his family. I don't understand nor will I EVER understand people/social services who split up children. It's wrong on so many levels. |
||
|
blairboy |
|||
|
Posts: 33944 (06/27/2009 2:07 AM)
|
Samantha James wrote:Debbie has NO contact with the kids at all. It's what she wanted. The other Mom no one knows who she is. She obviously has no contact with the child each. They should stay with their family, the family they are with now. Sending them outside of their comfort zone after their dad dead isn't right. And would not help their minds at all. 
|
||
|
Samantha James |
|||
|
Posts: 14321 (06/27/2009 2:20 AM) |
I think that staying together is ideal but might not be possible or the best thing. For example, if the best place for Debbie's two kids is with MJ's
biological family but the best place for the third child is with his mom's biological family, it be like that sometimes. You know what I mean?
I think it would be awesome if they could stay together in one place. But
it's not automatically the best decision. I think MJ wasn't in public very much and didn't share a lot about his personal life or his kids lives. I
don't know how involved the maternal grandparents and family are, you know?
|
||
 joey is a teapot |
|||
|
Posts: 66599 (06/27/2009 2:20 AM) Joey Fanatic '06
|
Joe Jackson can't even beat his meat anymore, much less a kid.
|
||
|
blairboy |
|||
|
Posts: 33945 (06/27/2009 2:23 AM)
|
MJ's family from what I read is completely involved with the kids, I don't believe ANY of the family on either Mother's sides have anything to do
with the children. I don't understand how it wouldn't be the best thing for them to stay with the family they've known their entire life. The next
few days is gonna be rough on those kids, hell, the next few YEARS are gonna be rough. I don't see the point in making more of a mess for them be putting
them with people they don't know from Adam.
|
||
|
JustMusic101 |
|||
|
Posts: 14822 (06/27/2009 2:23 AM) |
The fuck? Why give the kids to someone who didn't want the children anyway? And sure as hell not to her family, who the hell are they? They should stay
with the Jacksons, they know their family on the Jackson side as far as I know. I should rephrase, the kids should stay with whomever he designated and
something tells me that's no Debbie Rowe.
It would be horrible if those kids were split up. They've always been together and it should stay that way. I know my mom's stories of being apart from a sibling when you wanted to live in the same house and it wasn't fun, not for them. They knew they were in the same town but that never made it any easier to see each other. That would be absolutely HORRIBLE if those kids didn't get to stay together. And I wish Joe WOULD raise his hands to those kids, but something's telling me that wouldn't be happening. Reports keep citing Katherine as the one who has the kids right now, I wouldn't complain about that at all. Something tells me their marriage isn't functioning a way we'd commonly assume-- under one roof. |
||
|
Samantha James |
|||
|
Posts: 14322 (06/27/2009 2:27 AM) |
How do you guys know the maternal family isn't involved at all? Has MJ or anyone familiar with the situation said that?
I'm going to sleep, BTW. I have to go get my Beyonce on and be up to watch Made. I shall return to discuss tomorrow. 
|
||
|
blairboy |
|||
|
Posts: 33946 (06/27/2009 2:31 AM)
|
These been numerous reports that have confirmed that the only family who has any contact with the kids is MJ's family
|
||
|
beklah324 |
|||
|
Posts: 23357 (06/27/2009 9:19 AM) |
Samantha James wrote:Obviously I don't know this family or anything about them, but from personal experience, people can change. My grandparents were verbally and mentally abusive to each other and their children and my grandfather physically abused some of his children, including my mom. For the longest time, she never forgave him for her childhood but because of unfortunate circumstances, we lived with my grandparents almost my entire life. Now the verbal/emotional abuse never stopped and it was tough to live with but the physical did and my grandpa was the best grandpa to all his grandchildren. He wasn't the greatest father or husband, but he was a damn good grandpa. I think us grandchildren changed him for the better and he became a gentle man and settled down. So I could believe that Joe Jackson might have changed and he sees the errors of his way/his past and what he did was awful. I think his children forgave him, to some extent because they still seem close to their parents. Or at least that's the impression I get. Of course, I could be totally wrong 
|
||
|
kastang |
|||
|
Posts: 211 (06/27/2009 10:04 AM) |
Samantha James wrote:No one knows who the third "mom" is. She was just a donor. Like with a sperm donor, they have NO RIGHTS to the child. And she probably is under contract as well. |
||
|
07lulubeckham23 |
|||
|
Posts: 325 (06/27/2009 11:22 AM) |
There was a journalist, on a french channel news yeterday, that was saying he was surprised that no one believed him 6 month ago when he said that MJ had a
cancer and was gonna die soon.
And that apparently MJ had already written his will and was giving custody of his kids to Janet. I don't know if it's true, but he's a serious journalist so i don't know. |
||
|
xomadi89 |
|||
|
Posts: 2028 (06/27/2009 11:28 AM) |
JustMusic101 wrote: 
|
||
Quick Reply
