I love quirky indie movies, and I've watched a lot of shitty movies, but this was so completely awful that I'm disappointed in myself for sticking with
it the whole time.
I just wasted two hours on Rachel Getting Married.
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 KristinWasBanned |
I just wasted two hours on Rachel Getting Married. |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 1324 (06/20/2009 11:23 PM) |
|
||
|
Purplelilac82 |
|||
|
Posts: 14981 (06/20/2009 11:24 PM) |
 Rachel Sydney Rachel Sydney Rachel Sydney Rachel Sydney!
|
||
|
Valerie Me |
|||
|
Posts: 31216 (06/20/2009 11:25 PM) |
Booooorrrrriiiiinggg.
|
||
|
perrvy hobbit fancier |
|||
|
Posts: 3964 (06/20/2009 11:27 PM) |
Purplelilac82 wrote:That annoyed the hell out of me! Rachel Rachel Sydney Sydney, WTF? Shut up, fools. |
||
|
Fantasmic303 |
|||
|
Posts: 629 (06/20/2009 11:29 PM) |
Might I direct you to a wonderful place full of people who share your view: http://thejjb.com/topic/472780
You deserve to be around a group of people to support you through this difficult time...trust me, I've been there. |
||
|
mouse120 |
|||
|
Posts: 107 (06/20/2009 11:49 PM) |
I feel the exact same way
 I tend to stick to quirky indies, but this was horrible. I saw it in the theater and left halfway through when it started to give
me a pounding headache!
|
||
|
kerlifries |
|||
|
Posts: 15171 (06/20/2009 11:51 PM) |
props to sticking it out for that long. I turned that horrible movie off long before that.
|
||
|
Lauriestar |
|||
|
Posts: 14997 (06/20/2009 11:56 PM) JJB Angel '09
|
You've peaked my interest. I like bad movies.
|
||
|
DifferentialDiagnosis |
|||
|
Posts: 1203 (06/21/2009 12:03 AM) |
Lauriestar wrote:It's not good bad. It's pretentious and annoying. And it sucks that an Oscar nom was wasted on Anne Hathaway's performance. |
||
|
Lauriestar |
|||
|
Posts: 14998 (06/21/2009 12:03 AM) JJB Angel '09
|
Wow. I couldn't make it through the trailer. That's something.
|
||
|
xxGirlxxFixerxx |
|||
|
Posts: 2300 (06/21/2009 12:05 AM) |
My mom fell asleep and I tuned it out like 30 minutes in. I love Anne Hathaway but this movie and her performance were waaaaay too over hyped IMO for such a
shit-tastic movie.
|
||
|
LuvBug |
|||
|
Posts: 3055 (06/21/2009 12:05 AM) |
Good to know.
|
||
|
SusieMC |
|||
|
Posts: 437 (06/21/2009 12:05 AM) |
I hated every single character. EVERY single character. There wasn't a redeeming quality in any of them.
|
||
|
Purplelilac82 |
|||
|
Posts: 14985 (06/21/2009 12:08 AM) |
DifferentialDiagnosis wrote: I agree...it was pretentious and self indulgent. The scenes are far too long. |
||
|
Mistress Darcy |
|||
|
Posts: 9779 (06/21/2009 12:09 AM) |
SusieMC wrote:I think that is ultimatelty what condemned the film for me. Like, I wanted the Anne character to DIE so much. I got all excited at the end when she had the accident. Then she didn't die
|
||
|
xxGirlxxFixerxx |
|||
|
Posts: 2304 (06/21/2009 12:12 AM) |
DifferentialDiagnosis wrote: and this! I was like she gets an Oscar not for this crap yet Leo keeps giving Oscar worthy performances in several films and he gets the cold shoulder? Totally doesn't make sense. |
||
|
celebtrashwhore |
|||
|
Posts: 6731 (06/21/2009 1:03 AM) |
I enjoyed it. I thought it was going to suck and I dont particularly like Anne Hathaway. I dont think any of the characters were suppose to be likeable- i
think thats the point.
|
||
|
Simmm |
|||
|
Posts: 195 (06/21/2009 1:10 AM) |
I hated that movie. I also wasted 2 hours earlier today on Happy Go Lucky. It was sooo bad.
|
||
|
KristinWasBanned |
|||
|
Posts: 1328 (06/21/2009 1:11 AM) |
That's so funny Sim. Our other option was Happy Go Lucky. I guess it was a lose-lose situation.
|
||
|
Introversion |
|||
|
Posts: 1988 (06/21/2009 1:13 AM) |
I turned it off after about 5 minutes.
|
||
|
Simmm |
|||
|
Posts: 196 (06/21/2009 1:17 AM) |
I was sad because I usually love all British comedies.
|
||
Quick Reply
