She's a mother of six. Obviously her skin isn't going to be as smooth as it used to be. But that doesn't mean she is not beautiful.
Angelina Jolie on the Cover of July 2009 Harpers Bazaar
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 lucy1326 |
|||
|
Posts: 3637 (06/08/2009 8:06 PM) |
|
||
|
skeletrout |
|||
|
Posts: 79 (06/08/2009 8:20 PM) |
Yeah, looks exactly the same. No photoshopping at all.
 Even x-17 is laughing about it.
|
||
|
PreggyJolie |
|||
|
Posts: 7958 (06/08/2009 8:27 PM) |
Everyone run for cover the haters are here!
|
||
|
81A |
|||
|
Posts: 500 (06/08/2009 8:36 PM) |
PreggyJolie wrote: 
|
||
|
ICouldCatchAMonkey |
|||
|
Posts: 3670 (06/08/2009 8:41 PM) |
They used a retouched pap picture on the cover? That's so freaking weird.
|
||
|
TCLRT |
|||
|
Posts: 577 (06/08/2009 9:08 PM) |
skeletrout wrote: You and X-17 are full of S@#$ ! Angelina was not pale at that premier as you SHOULD be able to see from the other photos in this thread..  I don't know where they got that photo from, but it looks over exposed or
washed out.
|
||
|
Prada4u |
|||
|
Posts: 1368 (06/08/2009 9:40 PM) |
Can people just look at the cover of a beautiful woman and for once say she looks good without trying to put her down?
|
||
|
Tyler16 Tyler 16 |
|||
|
Posts: 3016 (06/08/2009 9:45 PM) |
TCLRT wrote:It's obvious they -X17 have messed with it, just like therealgossipgirl/skeletrout messed with that particular picture where she is pulling a face. I have seen similar pics to that and she did not look as gaunt as or pasty as in therealgossipgirl's pic! But Preggy is right, there's really no point engaging them. Angie looks good and the green eyed monster is riding them hard  . You know it will kill them to just say "nice or
cute" like they usually say for others. Or even better stay out.
|
||
|
franknbeans82 |
|||
|
Posts: 30434 (06/08/2009 9:56 PM) |
cliniqua/skeletrout...flip sides of the same coin.
|
||
|
therealgossipgirl |
|||
|
Posts: 214 (06/08/2009 10:14 PM) |
Tyler16 Tyler 16 wrote: 
|
||
|
k1eo |
|||
|
Posts: 648 (06/08/2009 10:20 PM) |
OMG what a difference!!! They photoshopped her earring and red eye effect! These are totally different women!
|
||
|
k1eo |
|||
|
Posts: 649 (06/08/2009 10:21 PM) |
therealgossipgirl wrote:gorgeous, thanks for posting! |
||
|
bellacullen |
|||
|
Posts: 78 (06/08/2009 10:26 PM) |
TCLRT wrote: I know, it's also not even the same shot. LOL The one below is. X-17 is supposed to be a papz agency and they can't get their hands on the shot, that fans can pull up in two secs ...??
|
||
|
shopprincess |
|||
|
Posts: 16389 (06/08/2009 10:48 PM) |
that's a pretty pic of her, no photoshop for sure, Gorgeous
|
||
|
blissty |
|||
|
Posts: 347 (06/08/2009 11:08 PM) |
bellacullen wrote: If they had to resort to that stunt, it's the demonstration by reverse that indeed they know that she is beautiful and not as old and washed up as they try to sell it. If not what other reason to take a picture photoshopping it and selling it s the real one tpo make their point across ? Isn 't it that that because the real picture wouldn't fall into their agenda ? Enough said. Jolie is by a long shot a beautiful woman who doesn't resort to botox, has had two pregnancies in the past three years, has 6 little children to take care of. If she has decided to age naturally, more power to her. Most of her colleagues her generation though having more time, money to pamper themselves don't even look as good while the rest are walking plastic surgery botoxed freaks ! |
||
|
therealgossipgirl |
|||
|
Posts: 215 (06/08/2009 11:30 PM) |
k1eo wrote: that's a huge difference! the magazine photoshop makes her look 28
while her natural one shows a 45 year old...
|
||
|
bellacullen |
|||
|
Posts: 83 (06/08/2009 11:35 PM) |
^^ actually the hater that posted the x-17 side by side, claimed FALSELY that they were ridiculing the cover, and saying AJ didn't look like that.
The hater was LYING. I went to x-17, they were saying the OPPOSITE, that they "had found a semi-similar photo" to the one Harper's used,
and they say, and I QUOTE: "No surprise that Ange doesn't need any photoshop help. She's just as gorge in real life as she is on the
cover."
...and right they are of course! 
So my apologies to x-17. Let this be a lesson to all, the hater stalkerati, obsessed with Angelina will just make up bullshit to suit them, you always have to check them out.
|
||
|
DollfaceHill |
|||
|
Posts: 292 (06/08/2009 11:36 PM) |
therealgossipgirl wrote:I hope that I look that good when I am 45 |
||
|
k1eo |
|||
|
Posts: 650 (06/08/2009 11:40 PM) |
therealgossipgirl wrote:You know what, I can't decide to what doctor you should check yourself at first, to the oculist or the psychiatrist? |
||
 angel 2 |
|||
|
Posts: 3660 (06/08/2009 11:43 PM) |
hens are crazy no need to engage with them they want drama
the two pics are the same she is a beautiful woman |
||
Quick Reply
