at Prince
Yep, that pretty much sums it up.
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
JellyRoll2 |
|||
|
Posts: 16114 (06/04/2009 12:36 AM) |
^^
at Prince
Yep, that pretty much sums it up. |
||
AFJDevon |
|||
|
Posts: 4754 (06/04/2009 12:48 AM) |
hooray NH!
|
||
99thdegree |
|||
|
Posts: 28913 (06/04/2009 1:23 AM) |
Yay. I'm from NH and I still vote absentee there so I'm pretty proud that they did the right thing.
|
||
LittleStar10 |
|||
|
Posts: 1194 (06/04/2009 8:42 AM) |
It makes me so happy to know as a citizen of NH that this has passed! I am a HUGE supporter of gay rights and this is amazing.
I do understand that there should be some guidelines set when it comes to religious organizations performing marriage services. But as a church aren't they allowed to refuse any couple? Do they just want literature so people can't legally pursue a refusal to marry due to their "lifestyle"? I find it hard to image that homosexual couple would want to be married in an establishment that is against homosexuality...but I guess I could be wrong! |
||
traveling surf |
|||
|
Posts: 76 (06/04/2009 9:23 AM) |
If same sex marriage was meant to be then it wouldnt take a man and a woman to procreate (have a baby) but two men together cant have a baby and the same for
two women so that tells me that its not a natural thing
|
||
LisaChasez |
|||
|
Posts: 108396 (06/04/2009 9:26 AM) JC Fanatic '03
|
traveling surf wrote:What about a man and a woman who can't have children? Or don't have children by choice? Should they not get married? And you know marriage is an artificial creation, right? Nature did not invent marriage. It's actually rare for any species to be monogamous. |
||
tearsinh3aven |
|||
|
Posts: 476 (06/04/2009 9:40 AM) |
yay!!!! I am extremely happy.
|
||
LittleStar10 |
|||
|
Posts: 1196 (06/04/2009 10:13 AM) |
Good to know that infertile women everywhere (including me) are not "natural"....THANKS! I'll make a note of it! I guess I should divorce my
husband because we can't procreate because that is what marriage is all about, it has NOTHING to do with love.
Again thanks for the insight! |
||
traveling surf |
|||
|
Posts: 77 (06/04/2009 11:06 AM) |
Dont twist my words i am talking about two people with the same equipment trying to have children a man on man or woman with a woman its impossible. I have
my opinion and that is it i wont respond to anymore posts regarding this. I follow Gods laws not politicians deciding what happens.
|
||
LisaChasez |
|||
|
Posts: 108404 (06/04/2009 11:13 AM) JC Fanatic '03
|
traveling surf wrote:God didn't invent marriage, either. And God has noting to do with marriage. Marriage is a CIVIL function. People can get married w/o God, but they cannot get married w/o the State. |
||
ipodconga |
|||
|
Posts: 14491 (06/04/2009 11:33 AM) |
LisaChasez wrote: Lisa!
And BTW traveling surf, why are we so concerned with reproduction now? Our population is full enough - I guarantee we have no threat of extinction
|
||