Woman can't live on 53k per week
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Froggy86 |
|||
|
Posts: 9385 (03/19/2009 4:39 PM) |
Pfft this girl needs to get a clue!
|
||
TYCP Sha |
|||
|
Posts: 95517 (03/19/2009 4:44 PM) |
Ridiculous. I know people who make 10k less than she's getting in a month & they're living just fine.
celebtrashwhore wrote: He looks like Hugh Hefner. |
||
twilightschild |
|||
|
Posts: 19018 (03/19/2009 4:47 PM) |
celebtrashwhore wrote:Thanks! Yeah, she should get the money while the getting's good since she'll get nothing when he dies. I don't see what's wrong with her hair/face. |
||
bigredmunkeebutt |
|||
|
Posts: 11834 (03/19/2009 4:48 PM) |
OMG, she looks EXACTLY like my friend's sister!
|
||
ZenGospelSinging |
|||
|
Posts: 175 (03/19/2009 4:59 PM) |
The poor thing! I guess everyone has been affected by the global economic downturn.
|
||
joey is a teapot |
|||
|
Posts: 63324 (03/19/2009 7:22 PM) Joey Fanatic '06
|
I could live NICELY for three YEARS with $53K.
|
||
evamarie32 |
Oh I hate hearing this crap! | ||
|
Posts: 83 (03/19/2009 7:30 PM) |
You know, I would walk up to her and kick her in the shins and slap the crap outta her for $1. I hope she ends up with EVEN LESS than the 43 frickin'
million she would have gotten from the pre-nup.
|
||
missb0823 |
|||
|
Posts: 5537 (03/19/2009 7:32 PM) |
femme0622 wrote:
|
||
Samantha James |
|||
|
Posts: 10462 (03/19/2009 7:32 PM) |
celebtrashwhore wrote:
|
||
raratwentyfour |
|||
|
Posts: 1856 (03/19/2009 7:34 PM) |
celebtrashwhore wrote:Dude let his 67 year old wang do the decision making and now he's paying. Damn
|
||
neoaddicted |
|||
|
Posts: 274 (03/19/2009 7:38 PM) |
Good for her. Old ass men deserve to lose as much as possible when their trophy wives leave.
|
||
DifferentialDiagnosis |
|||
|
Posts: 585 (03/19/2009 7:41 PM) |
neoaddicted wrote:This. |
||
marlsj |
|||
|
Posts: 10020 (03/19/2009 7:43 PM) |
JellyRoll2 wrote:
|
||
madduxgirl |
|||
|
Posts: 996 (03/19/2009 10:11 PM) |
That is more than I make in a year. And I live just fine.
|
||
FreeSpiritSinger84 |
|||
|
Posts: 3034 (03/19/2009 10:16 PM) |
I think she has every right to at least half.
|
||
YellowStar09 |
|||
|
Posts: 6300 (03/20/2009 12:53 PM) |
FreeSpiritSinger84 wrote:Why? I doubt she was with him while he was making the money. She is getting a good portion of that money. |
||
MandsLB8 |
|||
|
Posts: 3860 (03/20/2009 1:05 PM) |
I think I might be in he minority. $43 million from a cheating husband who had a net worth of $329 million? I think that's kind of messed.
I don't know the whole situation, nor do I really care to google it- but it seems he did make a lump sum of money while they were married because it says she was required to sign a POST NUP. I just feel like if he was worth all that money before they got married, he would have made her sign a pre-nup. Either way, that's a shit load of money. |
||
FreeSpiritSinger84 |
|||
|
Posts: 3042 (03/20/2009 1:09 PM) |
It's not about who made it. If she made shit tons of money instead of him it should be split in half accordingly. It's about dividing assets equally in
a marriage.
|
||
Momobobo |
|||
|
Posts: 10612 (03/20/2009 1:09 PM) |
MandsLB8 wrote:you sound like you don't even know what you think. If they have a prenup, they have a prenup. period. ETA; prenup/postnup whatever. it was an agreement. |
||
FreeSpiritSinger84 |
|||
|
Posts: 3043 (03/20/2009 1:11 PM) |
She didn't have a pre-nup. He made her sign something after he made the money within their marriage. Basically he screwed her over.
|
||


