Cheryl Burke: You Dont Have to Be a Size 0 to Be Beautiful
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
ceeceepoo |
|||
|
Posts: 192 (10/25/2008 12:01 AM) |
I'm a size 4 and sometimes a size 2 depending on the brand. Cheryl looks to be about my size, so there's a good possibility that she is a size 4. The
average size for non-celebrities is a size 6. She looks fine and normal.
|
||
King Lincey.niketalk |
|||
|
Posts: 192 (10/25/2008 12:08 AM) |
I can't stand these stupid ass critics. I'll happily take a woman who is 150 lb. +
|
||
kimjoy85 |
|||
|
Posts: 4580 (10/25/2008 12:13 AM) |
ceeceepoo wrote:Not in the US. |
||
Molieshka |
|||
|
Posts: 320 (10/25/2008 12:26 AM) |
She doesnt look like what we think of as a 4 but so many people surprise me with their own sizes that it wouldn't shock me if she was a size 4. When you
gain weight in your face it makes your whole body seem bigger too.
I think she looks great and it's a good message to fight back about being called fat- the last thing young ladies need to see is a girl who is NOT fat being called fat and laying down and taking it- it send the message those people were right |
||
ceeceepoo |
|||
|
Posts: 193 (10/25/2008 1:33 AM) |
I was trying to be nice when I said the average dress size for non-celebrity women was a size 6. I know in reality it is a lot more. The U.S. has an obesity
problem, I read that the average dress size went from size 8 to maybe size 12!
|
||
Scorpio86 |
|||
|
Posts: 94 (10/25/2008 1:49 AM) |
ceeceepoo wrote: A size twelve is not obese. |
||
kimjoy85 |
|||
|
Posts: 4583 (10/25/2008 1:55 AM) |
ceeceepoo wrote: Yeah its a 12 or 14. |
||
vs451 |
|||
|
Posts: 686 (10/25/2008 4:23 AM) |
I worked retail for many years, and size 0 and 2 practically didn't exist and were not carried by most stores maybe ten years ago. Size 4 and 6 were below
average and 8, 10 and 12 were what most stores carried in larger quantities. This obsession with being a size 0 is just beyond me. I think being skinnier than
a 6 is just too thin and just as unhealthy as being "fat."
|
||
Samantha James |
|||
|
Posts: 5144 (10/25/2008 10:23 AM) |
inthepink715 wrote:
|
||
kellyilla |
|||
|
Posts: 19691 (10/25/2008 11:09 AM) |
Autumn23 wrote: She looks an 8 to me and there's definitely nothing wrong with being an 8.
|
||
FantasyWriter02 |
|||
|
Posts: 2731 (10/25/2008 11:22 AM) |
Yeah, I was going to guess that she about a size 6.
|
||
bina07 |
|||
|
Posts: 74 (10/25/2008 5:20 PM) |
You CANNOT guess someone's dress size unless you've met them. People are usually much smaller in person than they look on TV and even in pictures.
People are always quick to say "no way is she that size" when in fact they have NO CLUE! |
||
brneyechick82 |
|||
|
Posts: 37459 (10/25/2008 7:06 PM) |
So what if she isn't stick thin, she is still thinner than the average woman size which I read is between a size 12-14. Both lacey and her still can dance
good, so it's not like the weight gain is affecting their moves. That being said Cheryl had said she only gained 5lbs, and it looks like more than that. I
like makism and louie, but it was a little rude of them to talk about people they work with weight.
|
||
RhinestoneCowgrrl |
|||
|
Posts: 10427 (10/26/2008 2:31 PM) |
I think Cheryl looks great, I can't believe her weight is even an issue.
|
||
PosterGirl2006 |
|||
|
Posts: 7547 (10/26/2008 9:42 PM) |
Jlgnxd wrote:Most of the time I think Angelina looks just fine (not so shockingly thin like people make her out to be), but I agree that she's never looked like an American size 6. She's small-framed, & has narrow hips. |
||

She looks an 8 to me and there's definitely nothing wrong with being an 8.
