nyews wrote:
merchasa wrote:
I love them, but Im not so sure about just having Shiloh on the cover holding her baby sister. I think it would have been nicer to have all the kids, or none of them. Signling out Shiloh when the twins have FOUR equal siblings who welcomed her, is sort of inappropriate, imho. And Im a fan, so please if you respond to my comment understand that I have a right to my opinion and that doesnt mean I am not a real fan. In fact, I bet this was an editorial decision because I highly doubt A and B would appreciate the use of just Shiloh. The twins are not more HERS just because of biology, that is the exact opposite of what that family is about. I just really dont like that only Shiloh is on the cover along with the parents and twins.I have seen this kind of comment more than a few times. What this person is failing to see in our oh-so-sensitive times is another reality at work here. 'People' is a commercial enterprise and THEIR editorial staff decide for COMMERCIAL reasons what the front page will look like. The Jolie-Pitts can have nothing to say about that. If 'People' decide a warm picture of a little white girl is a good highlite for what is behind the magazine cover well then that is because they are not in the business of racial access, they are in the business of selling magazines.
Luv your comment on this, nyews. I of course agree w/
your post. 
I wish I had come online sooner. Now I'm going to have to make a
special trip to the store to get my own copy. Oh the humanity. 
and many others who posted. 
