If you take all the letters you can make the words LICK TEN COCKS. omg, what is this crazy person trying to subliminally make us do O_O?!
Hannah Montana subliminal messaging
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
anniesahn |
|||
|
Posts: 773 (06/21/2008 7:07 AM) |
DUDE, did you see the subliminal message in LCorKRISTEN's name?!
If you take all the letters you can make the words LICK TEN COCKS. omg, what is this crazy person trying to subliminally make us do O_O?! |
||
LCorKRISTEN |
|||
|
Posts: 879 (06/21/2008 7:08 AM) |
"nigger" Disney has always been racist. They really are sick. THIS IS NOT A COINCIDENCE!!!!! |
||
insomniachollie |
|||
|
Posts: 32497 (06/21/2008 7:15 AM) Best Fan Fic Writer '08 |
The only reason I believe Disney is up to something is becasue they are. "It's true because they are?" That's a beautiful piece of playground logic with zero reasoning behind it. If you're so sure, prove it. Prove the intent behind these images - don't just list images and your own interpretation of them, which is all you've managed to do thus far or the last time you spouted this crap. Prove what Disney's intent was behind doing it, prove that they actually thought what you claim they thought. Prove why out of the multiple interpretations that you can draw out of any such images, Disney intended you to see sex. Prove why Disney would bother. Explain how and why it's the entire corporation doing this across the board over so many years as opposed to a couple of rogue animators cropping up every so often and doing something inappropriate in The Rescuers or on that Little Mermaid cover. Prove why the common denominator to these images is Disney rather the fact that it's always you looking at them and putting your own spin on them because you're so firmly convinced they are sexually based. Except... wait... you can't do a single thing to prove any of those things, despite the fact that in order to give any kind of merit to your claim you would have to do so. You can only spout your own opinion, which is based on your own interpretation of the images. Your logic is that because you see something Disney must have intended it, which is utterly fallacious. Hence why I say the sexual pre-occupation here is yours. |
||
LCorKRISTEN |
|||
|
Posts: 880 (06/21/2008 7:18 AM) |
insomniachollie wrote: There's nothing to "prove" ....they are just allegations and I'm trying to share what I have been able to see...simple as that. What more am I gonna do? |
||
LCorKRISTEN |
http://us.st12.yimg.com/us.st.yimg.com/I/noveltytoys-com_200 | ||
|
Posts: 881 (06/21/2008 7:28 AM) |
Kind of goes along with the 'ANA' + 'L' concept... |
||
insomniachollie |
|||
|
Posts: 32498 (06/21/2008 7:29 AM) Best Fan Fic Writer '08 |
There's nothing to prove? You've made accusations about Disney's intent while being unable to back them up with any reasoning beyond "well I
think it's about sex?" And it's just what *you* see? What more can you do (beyond the obvious which would be to at least attempt answering any of
those questions if you're sooooo sure Disney did it on purpose)?
Exactly!! You're making totally unsupported allegations based on nothing but your own sexually pre-occupied interpretations of the image. Glad you admitted it See all the sex you want anywhere you want, but don't blame Disney unless you can actually back that up. |
||
LCorKRISTEN |
|||
|
Posts: 882 (06/21/2008 7:30 AM) |
insomniachollie wrote: What do you mean? I am "backing up" my allegations with examples and pictures...that is all i can do! You think you know everything, I can see that. Why is this about sexually pre-occupied interpretations??? So these somehow only magically pop in my head what I'm watching Disney movies? It's becasue there's something there, and i'm picking up on it. I see none of this in other media. Just Disney.
Edited By: LCorKRISTEN
06/21/2008 7:33 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
anniesahn |
|||
|
Posts: 774 (06/21/2008 7:48 AM) |
LCorKRISTEN wrote: |
||
marlsj |
|||
|
Posts: 8375 (06/21/2008 7:54 AM) |
anniesahn wrote: |
||
insomniachollie |
|||
|
Posts: 32501 (06/21/2008 8:06 AM) Best Fan Fic Writer '08 |
I think I know everything? Au contraire, what I don't know could fill many books.
Your examples don't back up your allegations, they only prove that YOU see sex in Disney images and not Disney's intent. Given that other people can clearly look at them and not see sex, you have zero basis to assume Disney's intent. Unless you can start answering any of those questions I asked (with more than just blind supposition because that's what you assume they're up to) then you've backed up nothing except the idea that this is about the pre-occupation that YOU bring when you see 'em. There's no shame in that until you start trying to blame Disney for the workings of your own mind. And there's nothing magic about why it might be only Disney movies you see it in - if you're not stretching so hard to see sexual imagery somewhere then naturally you're less likely to see it. You're probably not even looking for it. If you want to believe it's only Disney, your mind can find the interpretation to fit that. It's a very human thing to see only what you want to see, we've all probably done it over one thing or another. If you can actually start displaying real reasoning and/or proof of Disney intent instead of just demonstrating over and over again that you see sex in their movies and assuming that what you see must be what they intended, then that's fair cop and I'd be willing to keep an open mind. Until then, if 'all you can do' is post more pictures and claim they must be about sex... don't be so surprised when people think it's you who has sex on the brain and not the Mouse House. |
||
JT got me lovestoned |
|||
|
Posts: 3128 (06/21/2008 8:32 AM) |
LCorKRISTEN wrote: Where exactly is the words MONTANA in this photo? There isn't ONE letter 'A' in this photo?
|
||
Kourtnie |
|||
|
Posts: 1300 (06/21/2008 8:49 AM) |
What the fuck are you on and why the fuck do you care enough to search for this shit?
|
||
Kourtnie |
|||
|
Posts: 1301 (06/21/2008 8:51 AM) |
anniesahn wrote:
|
||
cujoladdietara |
|||
|
Posts: 2416 (06/21/2008 8:57 AM) |
|
||
loco4NSYNC |
|||
|
Posts: 1136 (06/21/2008 10:07 AM) |
JT got me lovestoned wrote:
The only justification I can give to that statement is that the long, whitish thing that's coming out of the bottom right is placed directly behind her and she is turned so her backside is right in front of it... But yeah, I don't see anything else...I mean, Disney has added some nasty elements to movies before, but I don't see any of that in what's been pointed out... |
||
AngeLeeLee |
|||
|
Posts: 29779 (06/21/2008 10:20 AM) |
LMFAO
|
||
listwriter |
|||
|
Posts: 2212 (06/21/2008 10:31 AM) |
What kind of trippy thread is this?!
|
||
JinkyJibes |
|||
|
Posts: 32345 (06/21/2008 10:38 AM) |
I'm still not seeing anything
|
||
8 The one and only 8 |
|||
|
Posts: 7973 (06/21/2008 10:44 AM) |
Sorry to break it to you but you're grasping at straws here. Invisible straws!
|
||
x Pahk The Cah x |
|||
|
Posts: 13842 (06/21/2008 10:44 AM) |
I don't see ANYTHING you have "pointed out."
|
||

See all the sex you want anywhere you want, but don't blame Disney unless you can actually back that up. 

